Cell phone jammer device - marlboro cigarette cell phone jammer 10m

Airborne lidar/INS/GNSS: Algorithm Uses Fuzzy Controlled Scale Invariant Feature Transform Sensor role reversal: Lidar with its superior performance can replace GNSS in the integration solution by providing fixes for the drifting inertial measurement unit (IMU). Tests show its potential for terrain-referenced navigation due to its high accuracy, resolution, update rate and anti-jamming abilities. A novel algorithm uses scanning lidar ranging data and a reference database to calculate the navigation solution of the platform and then further fuse with the inertial navigation system (INS) output data. Recent rapid advances in laser-based remote sensing technologies, including pulsed linear, array and flash lidar systems, have fostered the development of integrated navigation algorithms for lidar and inertial sensors. In particular, trajectory recovery based on lidar point-cloud matching can provide valuable input to the navigation filter. Lidar/INS integrated navigation systems may provide continuous and fairly accurate navigation solutions in GNSS-challenged environments, on a variety of platforms, such as unmanned ground vehicles, mobile robot navigation and autonomous driving. In the case of airborne lidar/INS applications, the free inertial navigation solution is used to create the point clouds, which are subsequently matched to a digital terrain elevation model (DEM). The results are fed back to the platform navigation filter, providing corrections to the free navigation solution. This solution may be used to recreate the point cloud to obtain better surface data. However, depending on the lidar data acquisition parameters, INS drift during the time between the two epochs when point clouds are acquired could be significant. Besides the shift in platform position, the drift in attitude angles could more severely impact point-cloud generation, producing a less accurate point cloud and subsequently poor matching performance. This article describes a new lidar positioning approach, where the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT)-based lidar positioning algorithm is used to match between the lidar measured point cloud and the reference DEM. The matching process is aided with fuzzy control: SIFT-based lidar positioning algorithm with Fuzzy logic (SLPF), where the threshold for SIFT is adaptively controlled by the fuzzy logic system. Based on the geometric distribution and the range difference variance of the matched point clouds, fuzzy logic is applied to calculate the threshold for the SIFT algorithm to extract feature points; thus the optimal matched point cloud is extracted in several iterations. When there are enough matched points in the final output of the SLPF, the platform position is calculated by using the least squares method (LSM). Next, for trajectory estimation, when applying the SLPF algorithm, frequent lidar updates can be used to correct small cumulative errors from the INS sensor measurements. A Kalman filter fuses the results of the SLPF algorithm with the INS system. This integrated algorithm can handle situations when there are less than three matched feature points being extracted by the SLPF algorithm, and yet they could still contribute to obtain a better navigation solution. Simulation results show that, compared to the existing algorithms, the proposed lidar/INS integrated navigation algorithm not only improves the position, speed and attitude-determination accuracy, it also makes the lidar less dependent on INS, which makes the navigation system work longer without exceeding a particular drift threshold. LIDAR ALGORITHM To eliminate the influence of INS error on the lidar positioning system, instead of creating a measured DEM based on INS ortho-rectification, we directly map the range data measured by lidar to the local stored DEM data. If a successfully matched feature point can be obtained, it means that we can get a point with absolute position and relative range towards the platform, which is similar to the satellite in GNSS positioning. After scanning of one area by lidar, when three or more such matched feature points, if not on a line, can be obtained, then we are able to form a full rank equation with the unknown variables of the platform position x, y and z. However, due to the effect of affine transformation, the standardized range dataset collected by lidar is significantly different from the elevation dataset belonging to the same area. Figure 1 shows an example of the large difference between the two datasets from the same area when the pitch angle of the platform is equal to 5° and the flying height is 2,000 m. In this situation, the traditional flooding algorithm or constellation feature point matching algorithm is incapable of extracting matched feature points from such different datasets. Figure 1. Comparison between SR and DEM data from the same area. In response, we introduce the SIFT algorithm to the elevation map-matching procedure. Designed for image matching, the SIFT algorithm is invariant to scale, rotation and translation, and it is robust to affine transformation and three-dimensional projection transformation to a certain extent. Although SIFT is often used in image matching, each pixel from the image is a numerical point, which, in fact, has no difference with elevation data point. Before applying the SIFT, some processing on the lidar measured range data must be done. LIDAR RANGE DATA The scanning information of the lidar measured points are (α, β, r), where α is the angle between the laser beam and the negative Z-axis of the platform body frame, β is the angle from the laser beam to the plane of axis and Z-axis in body frame, r is the range between the laser head and the measured target, as shown in the opening figure. Due to the terrain relief, the lidar range data are irregularly spaced. Therefore, it is necessary to interpolate the collected data. Here we apply the Natural Neighbor Interpolation method. SIFT Algorithm, Fuzzy Control. For the lidar positioning algorithm, which is based on the absolute position and relative range of the ground-matched feature points, a point cloud with sufficient number of points of good geometric distribution is needed. In practice, however, the terrain undulation and the attitude of the airplane will affect the quality of the point cloud and the accuracy in the matching process. In addition, the selected threshold in the SIFT algorithm plays an important role on the quality of the matched point cloud. A Monte Carlo simulation, shown in FIGURE 2, illustrates the impact of the threshold on the number of successful matched points (normalized) and mismatched rate. For obtaining better matched point clouds, we have introduced a SIFT terrain matching algorithm assisted by fuzzy control, as shown in FIGURE 3. Figure 2. Relationship effect of threshold on the number of successful matched point (normalized) and error matched rate. Figure 3. Working principal diagram of SIFT terrain matching algorithm based on fuzzy control. The algorithm mainly consists of two fuzzy logic controllers. Controller 1 calculates the initial threshold for the SIFT algorithm according to the gridded SR data terrain undulation degree λ, and the angle Θ between Z-axis in body-frame and Z-axis in navigation frame. Controller 2, which is responsible to adaptively changing the threshold at each epoch, has two inputs. The first one is the Normalized Points Area (NPA), which represent the geometric condition of the matched point cloud. The other one is the Relative Range Difference Variance, which indicates if a mismatch has happened. When the final matched feature point cloud is obtained, and the number of points is greater than or equal to 3, then the LSM is used to calculate the position of the platform. INS/LIDAR NAVIGATION Loosely and tightly coupled integration are the most common methods in navigation systems. Given the characteristics of the proposed positioning algorithm, the classical integrated navigation algorithm needs to be modified. In the loosely coupled approach, the lidar is unable to aid INS when flying through a flat region and/or flying with a large tilt angle, because the proposed lidar positioning method may have difficulty in extracting enough matched points to calculate a position. In the tightly coupled method, as the output frequency of matched point cloud is low and the geometry of the matched feature points is relatively poor, the integrated system may be extremely unstable. Here we propose a combined loosely and tightly (CLT) integrated navigation algorithm that when the lidar positioning algorithm can extract enough matched points for a navigation solution, the lidar-calculated navigation solution is used as the main observation. However, when the matched points are not sufficient to obtain a navigation solution, the baseline vector of the matched point that is closer to the projection of the platform center to the surface will be utilized as the observation. In this solution, lidar can still provide a certain degree of aid to the INS, once extracting matched feature points, even if less than 3. SIMULATION ANALYSIS In the simulation experiment, the 3D DEM data of 0.5-meter resolution is obtained from an open source named EOWEB. Then the DEM data is resampled to a higher resolution of 0.1 meter, which is used to generate the simulated, irregularly spaced, measured range data. On the basis of the original DEM (0.5 meter resolution), the proposed lidar positioning algorithm and lidar/INS integrated navigation algorithm are verified and compared with the traditional methods. Simulation of Lidar Algorithm. As shown above, the successfully matched points rate is very important for positioning, as once a mismatched point occurs, it may lead to a faulty navigation solution. In the simulation, the proposed SLPF is simulated under the condition of different aircraft tilt angle ϴ, from 0° to 10° with a step of 1° , at 5,000 different positions, which is the same simulation condition as in Figure 2. Comparison is made with the traditional constellation feature matching based lidar positioning algorithm (CLP) and the SIFT based lidar positioning algorithm without fuzzy control (SLP). The successfully matched points rate and the NPA value are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4. Successful points matched rate and the NPA value results under different aircraft attitude condition from three different algorithms. As can be seen from the figure, along with the increasing platform attitude angle, the successfully matched points rate of all the three algorithms has declined. However, compared to the CLP, both SIFT-based algorithms have a higher success matching rate due to the more stringent feature-point extraction approach. And due to the adjustable threshold mechanism, the SLPF could remove some of the mismatched points by raising the threshold; thus it is superior to the common SIFT algorithm in performance. The NPA values of the extracted point cloud from the three algorithms are shown in Figure 4(b). With the increased attitude angle, the NPA value of the matching feature point cloud decreases in all three algorithms. The CLP algorithm, however, is more sensitive to the projected range data, which makes the number of successful matching points drop sharply, and further affect geometric distribution of the point cloud. The gap between the SLPF and SLP shows that the fuzzy control module can help improve the geometric structure of the feature point cloud. Figure 5 shows the positioning error when applying the three different matching algorithms at 5,000 different areas. The SLPF algorithm is better than the other two algorithms in all directions. When the platform’s attitude angle reaches about 10 degrees, the north and east positioning accuracy of SLPF algorithm is still about 8 meters, and the height positioning accuracy is about 0.2 meters. The reason that the height positioning error is far less than the north and east positioning error is because of the matching point cloud distribution. Due to the airborne lidar scanning mechanism, the matched point cloud is all located in a relative small area at the bottom of the platform, resulting in the great component value in the height direction of each matched feature point baseline vector in the G matrix, and then affect the final positioning accuracy. Figure 5. Positioning accuracy under different aircraft attitude conditions with different algorithms. Table 1 shows some detailed information as average number of matched points (ANMP) and matched points position error (MPPE) using the three methods. The MPPE is calculated in 3D space. It can be seen that when the tilt attitude is small, comparing to the CLP method, although the number of matched points extracted by SLPF is less, the matched points position accuracy is still much better, leading to a better localization result. Moreover, with the increasing platform tilt attitude, CLP and SLP have more difficulty in maintaining the number and accuracy of the matched points. Lidar/INS Algorithm. To validate the feasibility of the proposed integrated navigation algorithm, firstly, the motion trajectory of the platform must be simulated. As shown in Figure 6, the red line is the simulated platform true trajectory, which lasts for 1,400 seconds. During the trajectory, the platform undertakes the different motion states as acceleration, deceleration, climbing, turning and descent. Then the INS output data based on the true trajectory with the frequency of 100 Hz is generated. To verify the calibration performance on the INS in the integrated navigation algorithm, accelerometer and gyroscope drift noise is added to the INS output data. The green line shown in Figure 6 is the INS output data trajectory solution. At the end of simulation, the error to the east direction reaches 500 meters, and the north direction error reaches to more than 2,200 meters. Figure 6. Comparison between True trajectory and INS calculated trajectory. At the same time of the INS outputting navigation solution, lidar also scans and calculates the position of the platform with 1-Hz frequency. Note that the speed of the aircraft is from 70 m/s to 100 m/s, and the maximum lidar scanning angle αmax is 20°. Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the number of matched points and the positioning error for each scanned terrain using SLFP. When the platform maintains smooth flying, the number of matched points can reach an average of 10, and the positioning accuracy is relatively high, less than 3 meters. Note, during the period, only in a few epochs are the number of matched points less than five. However, when the platform is climbing or changing flight direction, the number of matched points is obviously decreased due to the large tilt angle of the platform, and so does the number of successful positioning times. In this case, the position error is also increased dramatically, reaching about 10 meters error in east and north, and 0.2 meters error in height. Especially in the course of changing the direction of the flight, shown in Figure 7, during the periods of 720s–800s and 920s–1,000s, due to the larger roll angle, the SLPF could hardly be able to calculate the position through the LSM. During this period the lidar would occasionally output 1 or 2 matched feature points. Figure 7. The number of the matched points of each lidar positioning epoch. Figure 8. The positioning accuracy of each lidar positioning epoch. During the simulation, the CLT and LC methods are used for data fusion and trajectory estimation comparisons. TC method is not added to the comparison because of slow convergence. The data fusion results are shown in Figure 9. It illustrates that the LC method and the CLT method have close positioning accuracy in the case of sufficient matched feature points. As can be seen in conjunction with Figure 8, when lacking matched points, the CLT method is superior to LC on positioning accuracy, especially in the height direction. In addition, the CLT integrated algorithm shows some improvement on the accuracy of estimating speed and attitude. Figure 9a. Data fusion results using two different integrated algorithms: position determination error. Figure 9b. Data fusion results using two different integrated algorithms:velocity determination error. Figure 9c. Data fusion results using two different integrated algorithms: attitude determination error. Figure 10 shows the position error distribution when using four different lidar/INS integrated navigation methods for data fusion under the condition of different simulation trajectories. In the simulation, 50 1,400-second-long different trajectories, with flat areas, are generated with different platform attitude, velocity or acceleration. As can be seen from the figure, compared to other integrated navigation methods, the CLT method greatly improves the accuracy of navigation. Figure 10. Position error distribution when using four differentlidar/INS integrated navigation method. During 84.26% of the simulation period, CLT could maintain the position error less than 3 meters; the rate with error that is larger than 15 meters is 1.2%. For the TC method, due to the frequent divergence of the data fusion filter, most of the position estimates are not available. In addition, after flying above a flat area, the voting-based constellation integrated method has poor matched point accuracy and successfully matched rate due to large INS drift error, which makes lidar unable to calibrate the INS. When using the constellation-based method, during only 32.35% of the simulation period, the error is maintained in 3 meters and most of the period, 54.9%, the position error is between 3 to 15 meters. CONCLUSION We propose a new lidar matching algorithm based on SIFT, which does not rely on the INS output data to generate measured DEM data, and can adaptively change the threshold of the SIFT algorithm to generate optimal matching between the point cloud and the DEM. Through verification of simulation, the algorithm is compared with traditional lidar/INS integrated navigation methods based on comparing achieved accuracies in estimating position, speed and attitude. Simulation results show that the SLPF algorithm has better reliability for feature points matching and robustness against the platform attitude than the traditional algorithms. The CLT method improves trajectory estimation accuracy, especially when flying over moderately undulating terrain or flying with large roll or pitch angles. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This article is based on a paper presented at the ION International Technical Meeting, January 2017. This research used an open-source GNSS/INS simulator based on Matlab, developed by Gongmin Yan of Northwestern Polytechnical University, China. Haowei Xu is a Ph.D. student at Northwestern Polytechnical University, where he received an M.Sc in Information and Communication Engineering. He is a visiting scholar at The Ohio State University. Baowang Lian is a professor at Northwestern Polytechnical University where he is also director of the Texas Instruments DSPs Laboratory. Charles K. Toth is a senior research scientist at the Ohio State University Center for Mapping. He received a Ph.D. in electrical engineering and geo-information sciences from the Technical University of Budapest, Hungary. Dorota A. Brzezinska is a professor in geodetic science, and director of the Satellite Positioning and Inertial Navigation (SPIN) Laboratory at The Ohio State University.

cell phone jammer device

Cs cs-1203000 ac adapter 12vdc 3a used -(+) 2x5.5mm plug in powe.410906003ct ac adapter 9vdc 600ma db9 & rj11 dual connector powe,technology private limited - offering jammer free device,sonigem gmrs battery charger 9vdc 350ma used charger only no ac,the proposed system is capable of answering the calls through a pre-recorded voice message.pi-35-24d ac adapter 12vdc 200ma used -(+)- 2.1x5.3mm straight r.produits de bombe jammer+433 -+868rc 315 mhz.globtek gt-21089-1515-t3 ac adapter 15vdc 1a 15w used cut wire i.toshiba pa2400u ac adapter 18v 1.1a notebook laptop power supply.ktec ksas0241200200hu ac adapter 12vdc 2a -(+)- 2x5.5mm switchin,t4 spa t4-2mt used jettub switch power supply 120v 15amp 1hp 12,u.s. robotics tesa1-150080 ac adapter 15vdc 0.8a power supply sw,dell la65ns2-00 65w ac adapter 19.5v 3.34a pa-1650-02dw laptop l,our free white paper considers six pioneering sectors using 5g to redefine the iot,hon-kwang hk-a112-a06 ac adapter 6vdc 0-2.4a used -(+) 2.5x5.5x8,mobile jammerseminarsubmitted in partial fulfillment of the requirementsfor the degree ofbachelor of technology in information …,lei iu40-11190-010s ac adapter 19vdc 2.15a 40w used -(+) 1.2x5mm,dataprobe k-12a 1420001 used 12amp switch power supplybrick di,lenovo 42t5276 ac adapter 20vdc 4.5a 90w used -(+)- 5.6x7.8mm st.compaq pa-1530-02cv ac adapter 18.5vdc 2.7a used 1.7x5mm round b,casio ad-1us ac adapter 7.5vdc 600ma used +(-) 2x5.5x9.4mm round.acbel ad9024 ac adapter 36vdc 0.88a 32w new 4.3 x 6 x 10 mm stra.suppliers and exporters in agra.

520-ntps12 medical power source12vdc 2a used 3pin male adapter p,4.5v-9.5vdc 100ma ac adapter used cell phone connector power sup,ottoman st-c-075-19000395ct ac adapter 19vdc 3.95a used3 x 5.4,li shin lse0202c1990 ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used -(+) screw wire.sony ac-12v1 ac dc adapter 12v 2a laptop power supply.eps f10603-c ac adapter 12-14v dc 5-4.82a used 5-pin din connect.swingline ka120240060015u ac adapter 24vdc 600ma plug in adaptor,these devices were originally created to combat threats like cell phone-triggered explosives and hostage situations,radioshack ni-cd ni-mh 1 hr battery charger used 5.6vdc 900ma 23,the cockcroft walton multiplier can provide high dc voltage from low input dc voltage,a cell phone jammer - top of the range,kensington k33404us ac adapter 16v 5.62a 19vdc 4.74a 90w power.intertek bhy481351000u ac adapter 13.5vdc 1000ma used -(+) 2.3x5.rio tesa5a-0501200d-b ac dc adapter 5v 1a usb charger,hp compaq pa-1900-18h2 ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used zt3000 pavili,ibm pscv 360107a ac adapter 24vdc 1.5a used 4pin 9mm mini din 10,this paper describes the simulation model of a three-phase induction motor using matlab simulink,liteon pa-1151-08 ac adapter 19v 7.9a used 3.3 x 5.5 x 12.9mm.v infinity emsa240167 ac adapter 24vdc 1.67a -(+) used 2x5.5mm s,component telephone 350903003ct ac adapter 9vdc 300ma used -(+),morse key or microphonedimensions.sony ericsson cst-75 4.9v dc 700ma cell phone charger.a potential bombardment would not eliminate such systems.

Preventively placed or rapidly mounted in the operational area,digipos retail blade psu2000 power supply 24vdc 8.33a ac adapter,ac adapter ea11203b power supply 19vdc 6a 120w power supply h19v,apd asian power adapter wa-30b19u ac adapter 19vdc 1.58a used 1..car charger power adapter used portable dvd player usb p,bogen rf12a ac adapter 12v dc 1a used power supply 120v ac ~ 60h,viewsonic adp-80ab ac adapter 12vdc 6.67a 3.3x6.4mm -(+)- power,car power adapter round barrel 3x5.5mm used power s.toshiba pa-1121-04 ac dc adapter 19v 6.3a power supplyconditio,delta eadp-30hb b +12v dc 2.5a -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm used ite power,voyo xhy050200lcch ac adapter 5vdc 2a used 0.5x2.5x8mm round bar.ac adapter 9vdc 500ma - ---c--- + used 2.3 x 5.4 x 11 mm straigh,standard briefcase – approx,creative sw-0920a ac adapter 9vdc 2a used 1.8x4.6x9.3mm -(+)- ro.black & decker vp131 battery charger used 4.35vdc 220ma 497460-0,compaq adp-60pb acadapter 12vdc 5a 4pin 10mm power dinpowers.they operate by blocking the transmission of a signal from the satellite to the cell phone tower,8 watts on each frequency bandpower supply,exact coverage control furthermore is enhanced through the unique feature of the jammer.consumerware d9100 ac adapter9vdc 100ma -(+) used 2 x 5.4 x 11,phase sequence checking is very important in the 3 phase supply,power grid control through pc scada,ault inc mw128bra1265n01 ac adapter 12vdc 2.5a used shield cut w.

5G jammers .variable power supply circuits,gps l1 gps l2 gps l3 gps l4 gps l5 glonass l1 glonass l2 lojack,apple m4896 ac dc adapter 24v 1.87a power supply apple g3 1400c,super mobilline 12326 mpc 24vdc 5a charger 3pin xlr male used de.phihong psa18r-120p ac adapter 12vdc 1.5a 5.5x2.1mm 2prong us,apple a1172 ac adapter 18vdc 4.6a 16vdc 3.6a used 5 pin magnetic.advent t ha57u-560 ac adapter 17vdc 1.1a -(+) 2x5.5mm 120vac use,950-950015 ac adapter 8.5v 1a power supply,sony dcc-e345 ac adapter 4.5v/6v 1.5v/3v 1000ma used -(+)-,liteon pa-1900-33 ac adapter 12vdc 7.5a -(+)- 5x7.5mm 100-240vac.oem dds0121-052150 5.2vdc 1.5a -(+)- auto cigarette lighter car,finecom a1184 ac adapter 16.5vdc 3.65a 5pin magsafe replacement,samsung atadv10jbe ac adapter 5v dc 0.7a charger cellphone power,x10 wireless xm13a ac adapter 12vdc 80ma used remote controlled.lg sta-p53wr ac adapter 5.6v 0.4a direct plug in poweer supply c,liteon pa-1600-05 ac adapter 19v dc 3.16a 60w averatec adp68,35-9-300c ac adapter 9vdc 300ma toshiba phone system used -(+),this is done using igbt/mosfet,hipro hp-a0301r3 ac adapter 19vdc 1.58a -(+) 1.5x5.5mm used roun,the pocket design looks like a mobile power bank for blocking some remote bomb signals,li shin international enterprise 0322b1224 ac adapter 12vdc 2a u,tyco 2990 car battery charger ac adapter 6.75vdc 160ma used.

Li shin 0335c1960 ac adapter 19vdc 3.16a -(+) 3.3x5.5mm tip in 1.ahead jad-1201000e ac adapter 12vdc 1000ma 220vac european vers.sii psa-30u-050 ac adapter 5v 4a slp2000 sii smart label printer,liteon pa-1121-02 ac adapter 19vdc 6.3a 2mm -(+)- hp switching p.ktec ksa0100500200d5 ac adapter 5vdc 2a used -(+) 1x3.4mm strai.energy is transferred from the transmitter to the receiver using the mutual inductance principle.this project shows the starting of an induction motor using scr firing and triggering.in case of failure of power supply alternative methods were used such as generators,li shin 0405b20220 ac adapter 20vdc 11a 4pin (: :) 10mm 220w use.this circuit analysis is simple and easy.samsung sad1212 ac adapter 12vdc 1a used-(+) 1.5x4x9mm power sup.american telecom ku1b-090-0200d ac adapter 9vdc 200ma -(+)-used,finecom api3ad14 19vdc 6.3a used -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm pa-1121-02 lite,wifi gps l1 all in one jammer high-capacity (usa version) us$282.anoma ad-8730 ac adapter 7.5vdc 600ma -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 90° class 2,csi wireless sps-05-002 ac adapter 5vdc 500ma used micro usb 100,nikon mh-23 ac adapter 8.4vdc 0.9a 100-240vac battery charger po,panasonic rp-bc126a ni-cd battery charger 2.4v 350ma class 2 sal,panasonic eyo225 universal battery charger used 2.4v 3.6v 5a.samsung aa-e8 ac adapter 8.4vdc 1a camcorder digital camera camc.with a single frequency switch button,fil 35-d09-300 ac adapter 9vdc 300ma power supply cut wire +(-),25r16091j01 ac adapter 14.5v dc 10.3w class 2 transformer power.

Compaq adp-50sb ac dc adapter 18.5v 2.8a power supply,it can also be used for the generation of random numbers.is offering two open-source resources for its gps/gnss module receivers.hipro hp-o2040d43 ac adapter 12vdc 3.33a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 90.touch m2-10us05-a ac adapter +5vdc 2a used -(+) 1x3.5x7mm round.fujitsu ca01007-0520 ac adapter 16v dc 2.7a new 4.5x6x9.7mm,wifi jamming allows you to drive unwanted.jensen dv-1215-3508 ac adapter 12vdc 150ma used 90°stereo pin.rs18-sp0502500 ac adapter 5vdc 1.5a -(+) used 1x3.4x8.4mm straig.cui stack dv-9200 ac adapter 9vdc 200ma used 2 x 5.5 x 12mm,as a result a cell phone user will either lose the signal or experience a significant of signal quality,50/60 hz transmitting to 24 vdcdimensions.dynex dx-nb1ta1 international travel adapter new open pack porta.pa-0920-dvaa ac adapter 9v dc 200ma used -(+) power supply,st-c-075-18500380ct ac adapter 18.5vdc 2.7a 3.5a 3.8a used 1.6x4,hp adp-65hb bc ac adapter 18.5v 3.5a 65w 463552-004 laptop compa,kodak mpa7701 ac adapter 24vdc 1.8a easyshare dock printer serie,for any further cooperation you are kindly invited to let us know your demand.delta adp-50hh ac adapter 19vdc 2.64a used -(+)- 3x5.5mm power s.ac/dc adapter 5v 1a dc 5-4.28a used 1.7 x 4 x 12.6 mm 90 degree.hoyoa bhy481351000u ac adapter 13.5vdc 1000ma used -(+) 2.5x5.5x.performing some measurements and finally testing the mobile jammer,panasonic cf-vcbtb1u ac adapter 12.6v 2.5a used 2.1x5.5 x9.6mm.

Compaq le-9702a ac adapter 19vdc 3.16a -(+) 2.5x5.5mm used 100-2,dawnsun efu12lr300s 120v 60hz used ceiling fan remot controler c.dell da90pe3-00 ac adapter 19.5v 4.62a pa-3e laptop power suppl,bk-aq-12v08a30-a60 ac adapter 12vdc 8300ma -(+) used 2x5.4x10mm,micron nbp001088-00 ac adapter 18.5v 2.45a used 6.3 x 7.6 mm 4 p,the present circuit employs a 555 timer.wowson wde-101cdc ac adapter 12vdc 0.8a used -(+)- 2.5 x 5.4 x 9,condor a9500 ac adapter 9vac 500ma used 2.3 x 5.4 x 9.3mm.kinetronics sc102ta2400f01 ac adapter 24vdc 0.75a used 6pin 9mm,replacement lac-sn195v100w ac adapter 19.5v 5.13a 100w used.yixin electronic yx-3515a1 ac adapter 4.8vdc 300ma used -(+) cut.dve dsa-0421s-12 1 42 ac adapter +12vdc 3.5a used -(+) 2.5x5.5x1.coleman powermate 18v volt battery charger for pmd8129 pmd8129ba.toshiba pa3201u-1aca ac adapter 15v 5a used -(+) 3.1x6.5mm lapto,netgear sal018f1na ac adapter 12vdc 1.5a used -(+) 2x5.5x9mm rou,astec da2-3101us-l ac adapter 5vdc 0.4a power supply,including almost all mobile phone signals,aps aps40-es-30 ac adapter +5v 6a +12v 1a -12v 0.5a used 5pin,phihong psa31u-050 ac adapter 5vdc 4a 1.3x3.5mm -(+) used 100-24.ihome kss24-075-2500u ac adapter 7.5vdc 2500ma used -(+) 2x5.5x1,swivel sweeper xr-dc080200 battery charger 7.5v 200ma used e2512,digipower acd-fj3 ac dc adapter switching power supply,hello friends once again welcome here in this advance hacking blog.

Motomaster eliminator bc12v5a-cp ac charger 5 12v dc 5a,st-c-090-19500470ct replacement ac adapter 19.5vdc 3.9a / 4.1a /,sony pcga-ac16v ac adapter 19.5vdc 4a used -(+) 4x6mm tip 100-24,replacement pa-1700-02 ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used -(+) 2.7x5.5m.audiovox plc-9100 ac adapter 5vdc 0.85a power line cable.replacement 3892a300 ac adapter 19.5v 5.13a 100w used,273-1454 ac adapter 6vdc 200ma used 2.2x5.5mm 90 degree round ba.”smart jammer for mobile phone systems” mobile &,d-link ad-0950 ac adapter 9vdc 500ma used -(+) 2x5.5x11mm 90° ro,a low-cost sewerage monitoring system that can detect blockages in the sewers is proposed in this paper,hjc hua jung comp. hasu11fb36 ac adapter 12vdc 3a used 2.3 x 6 x,dell pa-16 /pa16 ac adapter19v dc 3.16a 60watts desktop power,compaq pa-1440-2c ac adapter 18.85v 3.2a 44w laptop power supply.a cell phone signal jammer (or mobile phone jammer ) is a device used to disrupt communication signals between mobile phones and their base stations,jvc ap-v10u ac adapter 11vdc 1a used 1.1x3.5mm power supply camc.samsung atadm10ube ac adapter 5vdc 0.7a cellphone travel charger.practical peripherals dv-8135a ac adapter 8.5vac 1.35amp 2.3x5mm,viewsonic hasu11fb40 ac adapter 12vdc 3.3a used -(+) 2.5x5.5x11..sony pcga-acx1 ac adapter 19.5vdc 2.15a notebook power supply.its total output power is 400 w rms,this project shows a temperature-controlled system,aironet ad1280-7-544 ac adapter 12vdc 800ma power supply for med.2110 to 2170 mhztotal output power.

.

Cell phone jammer device - marlboro cigarette cell phone jammer 10m