Cell phone jammer 4g , kaidaer cellphone jammer doors

Looking Closely at Received GPS Carrier Phase By Johnathan York, Jon Little, and David Munton The stability of a received GPS signal determines how well the receiver can track the signal and the accuracy of the positioning results it provides. While the satellites use a very stable oscillator and modulation system to generate their signals, just how stable are the resulting phase-modulated carriers? In particular, do received signals always conform to the published system specifications? In this month’s column we take a look at a specially designed receiver for analyzing GPS carrier phase and some of the interesting results that have been obtained. INNOVATION INSIGHTS by Richard Langley A RADIO WAVE, OR ANY ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE FOR THAT MATTER, may be generally characterized by four parameters: amplitude, frequency, phase, and polarization. If the values of amplitude, frequency, and polarization remain constant, then the wave is a pure oscillation or “tone” and can be represented as a sine wave. An unvarying tone doesn’t convey any information. However, the wave can be modulated by varying one or more of its characteristic parameters in a controlled fashion. In this way information, whether it be audio, images, or data, can be transmitted from one place to another. The sine wave is therefore referred to as a “carrier” (of the modulation). A continuous wave is a wave that is not interrupted. Of course, radio waves are not only used for communicating. They’re also used for navigation, radar, and many other purposes including the jamming of other radio signals. The modulating signal may either be continuously varying (analog) or have a fixed number of values of one or more of the parameters (digital) — two values in the case of binary modulation. Amplitude modulation is commonly used for broadcasting and communications. If a continuous wave is interrupted by keying the transmitter on and off using a code of some kind, such as Morse code, information can be sent. For speech and music transmission, an audio waveform is modulated onto the carrier. Frequency modulation is used for very high frequency (VHF) high-fidelity broadcasts and for communications in the VHF and ultra-high-frequency ranges of the radio spectrum. The instantaneous carrier frequency changes with the frequency and amplitude of the modulating waveform. Phase modulation is typically used for data transmissions and, as we know, this is how the pseudorandom noise codes and the navigation message modulate the signal carriers of GPS and other global navigation satellite systems. (While the polarization of a wave can be modulated to transmit information, this is not very common.) The stability of a received GPS signal — both the carrier and its modulations — determines, in part, how well the receiver can track the signal and the accuracy of the positioning results it provides. While the satellites use a very stable oscillator and modulation system to generate their signals, just how stable are the resulting phase-modulated carriers? In particular, do received signals always conform to the published system specifications? In this month’s column we take a look at a specially designed receiver for analyzing GPS carrier phase and some of the interesting results that have been obtained. “Innovation” features discussions about advances in GPS technology, its applications, and the fundamentals of GPS positioning. The column is coordinated by Richard Langley, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick. By Johnathan York, Jon Little, and David Munton All global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) rely on well-defined data messages modulated onto stable carrier signals. The transmission of signals that adhere to published interface specifications (ISs) is what permits a GPS or GLONASS signal to be transmitted from a satellite and to be decoded at our receiver. This process is one that most of us never need to consider, and is part of the background magic that make GNSS so powerful. Still, signals are generated and received by real hardware — hardware that can be subject to the harsh space environment or a challenging ground environment. And once these signals are generated, they propagate to the user along a path through a dynamic medium that includes the ionosphere — a dilute plasma that introduces a well-known time-delay and phase change into the signal. The net result is is an effect on the signal that depends on both time and space. An interesting question is the following: How do we know that the signal we plan to send (as documented in an IS) is actually the signal that we receive? A pragmatic answer is that GNSS positioning works. If there is a difference between the IS-defined signal and the received signal, the impact is not seen by most users. Another answer is that satellite vendors test (and then test again) their equipment prior to launch, providing a high level of certainty that the ISs are being adhered too. In this article, we will describe our work in providing a third way of answering the question — by monitoring signals — motivated by our desire to see “all the bits, all the time.” We have seen some interesting effects in our observations, and we will discuss our attempts to detect and characterize these effects. Background For our purposes, we will be looking strictly at the L1 C/A-code signal. The reasons for this will become clear shortly. The standard textbook form of the noiseless signal is   (1) where P is the signal power, cCA(t) is the C/A-code modulation stream of plus and minus ones, nNav(t) is the navigation bitstream that is modulated onto the signal, and the cos(ωt) factor represents the fundamental carrier frequency, with ω being the angular frequency (ω=2πf). For the GPS L1 signal, f = 1575.42 MHz. The GPS receiver processes this signal (in the presence of noise) into the observables (such as range, phase, or Doppler frequency shift), or the positions and velocities that we need. One of the research problems that we find interesting is determining how to monitor the details of the signal in Equation (1) or of any other GNSS signal. Why would this be of interest? To us this is interesting because we have seen events where the signal does not behave as expected. In fact, these events were first noted by the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) receivers, and were later noted again in ionospheric observations. By being able to monitor the signal at a very detailed level, we can hope to gain insight into the origins of these events. We are not alone in wanting to validate that the signal and data being produced by a GNSS receiver is valid. A standard approach to monitoring the GNSS signal would be to use an autonomous receiver method, known as receiver autonomous integrity monitoring or RAIM. However, in this approach, the integrity of the navigation solution is evaluated based on the range and phase observables produced by the receiver, and we obtain no insight into the behavior of the actual signal — only the receiver’s behavior in processing the received signals. Another option is to directly observe each satellite’s signal using a high-gain antenna. This approach provides significant insight into the behavior of the signal but is expensive and is really only effective on one satellite at a time. A system, which is close in spirit to our approach, is the Ohio University GPS Anomalous Event Monitor (GAEM). GAEM consists of two high-quality commercial receivers, which serve as independent triggers for an RF capture system. When the receivers detect an anomaly, the RF capture system is able to provide 20 seconds of raw RF data for study. Using an Inexpensive Software Receiver The observations we will discuss in the rest of this paper were made using what we term the Global Navigation Satellite System Complex Ambiguity Function receiver, or GCAF. The GCAF is a prototype receiver, and is well suited to some of the detailed analysis we have described. Briefly, the GCAF receiver is a single-channel, single-frequency (L1) GPS receiver, which uses firmware installed on a field programmable gate array (FPGA) to process the incoming GPS signal. FIGURE 1 is a labeled photograph of the GCAF. RF down-conversion occurs in the module at lower left. The down-converted signal is passed to an FPGA-based software receiver, shown at lower right. All of the processing to produce the complex correlation curves is done in the software receiver. The aggregator, shown at upper right, simply provides an Ethernet interface to the outside. FIGURE 1. The GCAF receiver. The incoming signal is correlated against a replica of the expected L1 C/A-code signal, generating samples of the correlation curve. The difference between the GCAF and many standard commercial GPS receivers is that the GCAF samples the C/A-code correlation curve at 512 points (lags) at a 1-kHz rate. Each correlation sample is complex, consisting of in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components, with the software that processes the receiver raw data designed to maintain the signal in the I-component, and noise in the Q-component. As a result, the GCAF engine not only tracks the signal where it is expected to appear, but also at nearby offset phases and Doppler shifts simultaneously, and this ability substantially eliminates dependence on the tracking loop behavior and allows the observation of the characteristics of the received signal, rather than inferring them from observations of tracking loop behavior. See the sidebar, for more details on the receiver’s operation. Since the GCAF provides access to the high-rate complex correlation values, we can “decode” the navigation modulation sequence, nNav(t), from the incident signal by tracking the correlation peak phase and watching for phase changes. These phase changes correspond to distinct changes in the carrier phase. FIGURE 2 shows results from measurements collected with the GCAF while observing space vehicle number (SVN) 26 / pseudorandom noise code number (PRN) 26 on August 22, 2009. The top plot shows the amplitude of the in-phase component of the incident signal in blue, and that of the quadrature component in red. The amplitude is in arbitrary units, while the time along the bottom is in milliseconds–so the entire snapshot is only 0.6 seconds long. FIGURE 2. Amplitude and phase of the detrended L1 C/A-code carrier of SVN26 (PRN26) recorded on August 22, 2009, at 10:16:30 GPS Time. These results in Figure 2 are as we expect, with the dominant energy appearing in the I-component. Clearly visible in the I-component is the navigation bitstream, which appears as a series of 180° phase changes in the carrier signal (hence changing the sign of the amplitude). The lower plot in Figure 2 shows the results of a “squaring” detector applied to the complex signal. Effectively this doubles any phase changes, since (ejφ)2 = ej(2φ). This nicely converts the navigation bitstream transitions to 2 × 180°, or 360°, which removes them from the signal. (This is the approach pioneered by one of the first commercial GPS receivers, the Macrometer, for providing correlation-free L1 phase observations by removing both the code and navigation message phase transitions.) What the lower plot in Figure 2 conveys is the absence of any transitions other than the expected ones of 180°. However, not all of our measurements are quite this typical. In some cases we observe what we term “carrier-phase signal events” (CPSEs). FIGURE 3 shows a typical example of such a CPSE taken on SVN48 (PRN21) on March 13, 2010. In the upper plot, note the sudden change in amplitude in the quadrature component near -100 milliseconds. In the lower plot, note the sudden changes in the carrier phase that occur at the same times as the amplitude changes. In this case, the squaring detector shows clear evidence of a transition that was not anticipated, and appears to be of approximately 90° and persist for approximately 175 milliseconds. FIGURE 3. Decoded navigation bitstream on SVN45 (PRN21) taken on March 13, 2010, at 20:28:54 GPS Time. Of course, the single-channel nature of the GCAF does not permit an unambiguous identification of where in the signal chain a CPSE is introduced. The introduction of events might occur within the satellite transmission chain, or be produced within the propagation environment, or possibly be a quirk of the receiver itself. However, the types of events we observe seem a very unlikely failure mode for the GCAF. In the case of the example shown in Figure 2, the only place in the system where a signal at the exact Doppler-shifted frequency of the SV is in the numerically controlled oscillator (NCO) of the carrier-tracking loop. The GCAF tracking loop is updated at a rate slower than many of these events and manual examination of telemetry from the tracking loops in specific instances indicates no anomalous or discontinuous tracking behavior during the events examined. If events are generated by the local receiver environment, one possible mechanism would be a small multipath source at a position so as to induce a phase shift at a greater magnitude than the direct signal. This appears unlikely as events occur at many times of day (and therefore multipath geometries), and have onsets and durations that are difficult to explain with a reasonable multipath reflector. As a prototype instrument, the GCAF does have practical limitations. One of these limitations is that observations are divided into 5-minute intervals, at which point the signal is reacquired and data collected for another 5-minute interval. This is an operational limitation, which serves to improve robustness and bound individual output file sizes to 1 gigabyte each, and as a result, limits the durations of the CPSE that we can observe. Event Detection The simple squaring detector discussed above is not sufficient to provide a robust detection mechanism for the type of CPSEs we might see. In fact, we wanted a metric that would not rely on a pre-definition of what we might see in the signal, but which would flag changes in signal phase that might be interesting. To develop this metric, we borrowed ideas from the field of metrology, specifically work that characterizes noise types in oscillators. We ended up focusing on the modified Allan variance. While we will not detail the derivation of our metric here, we will discuss the results. The basic idea is to consider the phase, ϕ, of the GPS signal, averaged over sequential periods of duration τ. We choose τ to satisfy τ > 1 millisecond, since this is the basic chipping period of the L1 C/A-code signal. For the n-th period, τ, we denote this averaged phase by ϕn>. By considering the impact of noise, specifically receiver thermal noise and clock stability, we can formulate a probabilistic bound of the form:   (2) The interpretation of this result is that for a given averaging period τ the interval-to-interval variation in the average phase should never be too large. The right-hand side of Equation (2) provides a threshold for the phase variations over three consecutive periods, and is determined by the receiver thermal noise and clock stability. This bound, which is probabilistic in nature, applies with a false alarm rate of once in 10 years. If the metric exceeds this threshold, we declare that a phase event may have occurred within the three intervals. There is still the practical question of what averaging intervals τ need to be chosen. We have chosen to use a discrete set of τ that range from a few milliseconds to several seconds. This enables us to identify CPSEs that might occur rapidly (that is, at millisecond levels) or more slowly (at second levels). FIGURE 4 provides an example of the metric response to three consecutive CPSEs that are associated with SVN48 (PRN07). The upper plot shows the results of the squaring detector applied to the phase. Clearly evident are three rapid phase changes of about 20°. The next plot shows the result of the detection metric, which shows three double peaks in the vicinity of the phase changes. The third plot shows the I- (blue) and Q- (green) signal components. The bottom plot shows the NCO offset, which is a useful diagnostic. FIGURE 4. A CPSE observed on SVN48 (PRN07) on September 15, 2010, at 19:21:42 GPS Time. (Click to enlarge.) Observations of Signal Events The examples we have shown so far reflect what we refer to as two-sided discontinuities; that is, a sudden change in phase, followed by a return to close to the original value. FIGURE 5 shows a similar type of CPSE, in which we only see one side of the change. We have seen this type of event quite commonly on SVN62 (PRN25). If there is a return to the original phase, it may be beyond our observation period. Note that the apparent slope in Figure 5 is an artifact of a linear detrending process acting across the discontinuity. FIGURE 6 shows an example of a different type of CPSE that we occasionally see, one in which a change in the slope of the phase occurs (corresponding to a change in frequency). The figure shows a single inflection in the phase rather than a rapid change in the phase value. FIGURE 5. A CPSE observed on SVN62 (PRN25) on January 16, 2011, at 16:26:03 GPS Time with a magnitude of about 40°. (Image: Authors) FIGURE 6. A CPSE observed on SVN38 (PRN08) on September 29, 2009, at 18:26:20 GPS Time. (Click to enlarge.) Over the entire GPS constellation, we see events with rapid phase changes most frequently associated with the signals from three SVNs: 45 (an original Block IIR satellite), 48 (a Block IIR-M satellite), and 62 (a Block IIF satellite). This is most clearly shown in FIGURE 7, which contains a histogram of the number of events with rapid phase changes we have seen, broken out by SVN. For this histogram, we have chosen to count only those events that have well-defined phase discontinuities. Other SVNs, for example SVN34 (a Block IIA satellite), will show CPSEs on occasion, but the signals from this set of three SVNs are the ones that we have come to observe most closely. Until recently, SVN62 was the newest SV, and so we have been heavily weighting our observations on this SV. FIGURE 7. Histogram of event counts for SVNs 45, 48, and 62 (PRNs 21, 07, and 25) covering the periods from mid-2009 until mid-August 2011. (Data: Authors) Is There an Impact on Users? To conclude, it is worth assessing what the potential impact of signal events on user equipment might be. We first began to investigate the detailed carrier-phase structure when we learned that the FAA WAAS system found that the carrier phase from SVN45 behaved differently than the rest of the GPS constellation, and that similar effects were seen in SVN34 (PRN04) and SVN35 (PRN05). What was observed were short-duration irregularities ( But what about more standard user equipment? Given the types of events that we have observed, particularly those in which the phase changes suddenly and by a large amount, it is natural to ask how this might impact position and navigation users. A momentary 90-degree phase shift that lasts tens to hundreds of milliseconds might have varying effects on receivers depending on the duration of the event, the design of the carrier tracking loop in the receiver, and the instantaneous noise environment at each receiver. If the CPSE is shorter than the inverse of the receiver carrier tracking loop bandwidth, then the receiver might perceive the CPSE as a very brief loss of signal since the tracking loop will not be able to respond quickly enough. Observables formed from a second or more of raw values are likely to experience a small reduction in signal strength. As a result, short events are likely to go undetected by a traditional receiver that is primarily performing navigation. However, CPSEs that persist longer than the inverse of the receiver carrier-tracking-loop bandwidth could be interpreted by the receiver in a variety of ways, including a combination of cycle slip(s), navigation bit polarity inversion, or rapid carrier-phase changes. Summary We have been engaged in a detailed examination of the GPS L1 C/A-code signal for several years. In examining the signals, we have found that there are times when the signal exhibits an unexpected transition in phase. Looking across the GPS constellation, we find that these events tend to vary by satellite, both in rate and in behavior. While the impact from these events on most user equipment is small, the fact that the behavior is unique by SV is interesting. The type of detailed signal monitoring we have described is useful in two ways: it provides a means of observing effects that might otherwise pass unnoticed, and it gives us the capability to look for events in the future that might have a more obvious impact. Acknowledgment This article was stimulated by our research paper “A Non-Traditional Approach to Analysis of Signal Structure Anomalies Observed in PRN 21” presented at ION GNSS 2010, the 23rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation in Portland, Oregon, September 21–24, 2010. Manufacturer The GCAF receiver uses a Xilinx, Inc., Spartan-3 FPGA. The Global Navigation Satellite System Complex Ambiguity Function Receiver The signal from the GCAF’s antenna passes through an amplifier stage, and then to an analog front end, where the signal is downconverted from the L1 frequency, 1575.42 MHz, directly to in-phase and quadrature IF signals. The signal is then passed to a Flexible Low-power Wideband Receiver (FLWR). The FLWR is a low-cost FPGA-based digitizing receiver designed and built by the Applied Research Laboratories at the University of Texas. Notably, the FPGA implementing the C/A-code replica generation and computation of the fast numeric theoretic transform (FNT) is an inexpensive 400 kilo-gate FPGA. The receiver is a two-channel, 10-bit, direct sample receiver, operating at 100 megasamples per second. The FLWR was built to operate as part of an array of antennas, and so connects to an aggregator. In the application discussed in this article, the aggregator simply serves as an interface between the receiver and a host computer. The C/A-code replica generator and the FNT computation of the correlation functions are written as Verilog firmware and loaded onto this receiver. Command and control and data collection occur over a USB port on the aggregator board, which is connected to a local computer. The host computer receives the time-domain correlation curves from the FPGA and stores them on disk for future processing. The time-domain correlation curve data is also processed by software in the host computer in order to provide feedback to the code and carrier local replica generators on the FPGA. In this way, the tracking loops are closed through the host computer via USB approximately every 100 milliseconds. Because the prototype GCAF provides hundreds of correlator output lags and a rapid dump period, the GCAF is able to track the peak very loosely. That is, unlike a traditional three-lag correlator, which must constantly track the correlation peak in order to produce meaningful data, the GCAF tracking loop needs remain only in the vicinity of the peak. Because the FNT-based GCAF is bit-accurate to traditional early/prompt/late correlators at each lag, there is potential to produce geodetic-quality observables in this loose tracking mode. This stands in contrast to the coarse quality typical of FFT-based loose-tracking approaches. In many cases, this property may make redundant the early/prompt/late-style correlator typically found alongside FFT-based correlators. Specifically, our prototype implementation has a sufficient number of correlator lags and a sufficiently high dump rate such that it is necessary to remain only within ±25 microseconds of the code peak and ±50 Hz of the carrier peak. The loose-tracking capability of GCAF has interesting implications for signal quality (and anomaly) monitoring. Commercially available atomic frequency standards have time drift rates of 0.2 microseconds per month, and absolute frequency accuracies of well below 1 Hz at the GPS L1 frequency. This level of accuracy means that the GCAF can perform open-loop tracking of GNSS signals when the receiver and satellite positions are known. Open-loop tracking is very useful for anomaly diagnosis and monitoring, as it observes the signals as received from the satellite, as opposed to observing their effects on a tracking loop. Johnathan York received a Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. He has worked at the University of Texas Applied Research Laboratories (ARL:UT) since 2001, working primarily with high-throughput real-time digital signal processing applications. Jon Little is a senior engineering scientist at ARL:UT. He holds a B.S. degree (1988) and an M.S. degree (1990) from Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. He has worked extensively with the design and development of GPS ground systems and receivers. David Munton received a B.S. degree in physics from Sonoma State University in Rohnert Park, California, and a Ph.D. degree in physics from The University of Texas at Austin. He has worked as a research scientist at ARL:UT since 1993. His GNSS research interests include precise positioning and three-frequency measurement combinations. FURTHER READING ◾ Carrier-Phase Events and Monitoring “A Non-Traditional Approach to Analysis of Signal Structure Anomalies Observed in PRN 21” by J. Little, J. York, A. Farris, and D. Munton in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2010, the 23rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, September 21–24, 2010, pp. 2190–2198. “Carrier-Phase Anomalies Detected on SVN-48” by B.W. O’Hanlon, M.L. Psiaki, S.P. Powell, and P.M. Kintner. Jr., in GPS World, Vol. 21, No. 6, June 2010, p. 27. “GNSS Watch Dog: A GPS Anomalous Event Monitor” by Z. Zhu, S. Gunawardena, M. Uijt de Haag, F. van Graas, and M. Braasch in Inside GNSS, Vol. 3, No. 7, Fall 2008, pp. 18–28. ◾ GCAF Receiver “A Fast Number-theoretic Transform Approach to a GPS Receiver” by J. York, J. Little, D. Munton, and K. Barrientos in Navigation: The Journal of The Institute of Navigation, Vol 57, No. 4, Winter 2010, pp. 297–307. “A Complex-Ambiguity Function Approach to a GPS Receiver” by J. York, J. Little, D. Munton, and K. Barrientos in Proceedings of ION GNSS 2009, the 22nd International Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Savannah, Georgia, September 22–25, 2009, pp. 2637–2645. ◾ GPS Interface Specification Navstar GPS Space Segment / Navigation User Interfaces, Interface Specification, IS-GPS-200 Revision E, prepared by Science Applications International Corporation, El Segundo, California, for Global Positioning System Wing, June 2010. Global Navigation Satellite System GLONASS, Interface Control Document, Navigational Radio Signal in Bands L1, L2 (Edition 5.1), prepared by Russian Institute of Space Device Engineering, Moscow, 2008. ◾ Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring “The Integrity of GPS” by R.B. Langley in GPS World, Vol. 10, No. 3, March 1999, pp. 60–63. ◾ GPS Signal Components “Minding Your Is and Qs” by R.B. Langley, a sidebar in “Open Source GPS–A Hardware/Software Platform for Learning GPS: Part II, Software” by C. Kelley and D. Baker in GPS World, Vol. 17, No.2, February 2006, p. 56. ◾ Modified Allen Variance “Allan Variance and Clock Stability” by R.B. Langley, a sidebar in “New IGS Clock Products: A Global Time Transfer Assessment” by J. Ray and K. Senior in GPS World, Vol. 13, No. 11, November 2002, p. 48. The Science of Timekeeping by D.W. Allan, N. Ashby, and C. Hodge, Agilent (formerly Hewlett-Packard) Application Note AN1289, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, California, 1997 and 2000.

cell phone jammer 4g

Samsung astec ad-8019 ac adapter 19vdc 4.2a used -(+) 0.7x3x5x9,vg121ut battery charger 4.2vdc 600ma used video digital camera t,12v car charger auto cigrate lighter 1.5x4mm round barrel,sunbeam pac-259 style g85kq used 4pin dual gray remote wired con,i have placed a mobile phone near the circuit (i am yet to turn on the switch).leap frog 690-11213 ac adapter 9vdc 700ma used -(+) 2x5x11mm 90°,video digitial camera travel battery charger,compaq pa-1440-3c ac adapter 18.85v 3.2a 45w used 4-pin connecto.i-mag im120eu-400d ac adapter 12vdc 4a -(+)- 2x5.5mm 100-240vac,csec csd0450300u-22 ac adapter 4.5vdc 300ma used -(+) 2x5.5mm po,butterfly labs ac adapter 13vdc 31a 2x 6pin pci-e bfl power supp,apple macintosh m4402 24vdc 1.875a 3.5mm 45w ite power supply.compaq ad-c50150u ac adapter 5vdc 1.6a power supply,ault pw173kb1203b01 ac adapter +12vdc 2.5a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm m,cisco systems 34-0912-01 ac adaptser 5vdc 2.5a power upply adsl,temperature controlled system,at&t sil s005iu060040 ac adapter 6vdc 400ma -(+)- 1.7x4mm used.starting with induction motors is a very difficult task as they require more current and torque initially,cobra ca 25 ac adapter dc 16v 100ma power supply charger.pa3201u-1aca ac adapter 15v 5a laptop power supply,handheld cell phone jammer can block gsm 3g mobile cellular signal,tc98a 4.5-9.5v dc max 800ma used travel charger power supply.radioshack 23-240b ac adapter 9.6vdc 60ma used 2-pin connector.cellet tcnok6101x ac adapter 4.5-9.5v 0.8a max used,magellan 730489-c ac car adapter used 0.8x3.4x7.9mm 90°round bar,5 ghz range for wlan and bluetooth,power grid control through pc scada,the rf cellulartransmitter module with 0,ault mw116ka1249f02 ac adapter 12vdc 6.67a 4pin (: :) straight.li shin 0405b20220ac adapter 20vdc 11a -(+) used 5x7.4mm tip i.philips 8000x ac adapter dc 15v 420ma class 2 power supply new,safe & warm 120-16vd7p c-d7 used power supply controller 16vdc 3,asian micro ams am14 ac adapter +5v 1.5a +12v 0.25a power supply,plantronics ud090050c ac adapter 9vdc 500ma used -(+)- 2x5.5mm 9,biogenik 3ds/dsi ac adapter used 4.6v 1a car charger for nintend,hp compaq sadp-230ab d ac adapter 19v 12.2a switching power supp.rayovac ps1 ac adapter 2vdc 200ma used battery cell power charge,sony adp-8ar a ac adapter 5vdc 1500ma used ite power supply,cisco at2014a-0901 ac adapter 13.8vdc 1.53a 6pins din used powe.macintosh m4402 ac adapter 24v dc 1.9a 45w apple powerbook power.please visit the highlighted article,galaxy sed-power-1a ac adapter 12vdc 1a used -(+) 2x5.5mm 35w ch.and frequency-hopping sequences,archer 273-1651 ac adapter 9vdc 500ma used +(-) 2x5x12mm round b.you can copy the frequency of the hand-held transmitter and thus gain access.usb adapter with mini-usb cable,archer 273-1454a ac dc adapter 6v 150ma power supply.cui 48-12-1000d ac adapter 12vdc 1a -(+)- 2x5.5mm 120vac power s.lp-60w universal adapter power supply toshiba laptop europe,casio ad-c59200j ac adapter 5.9v dc 2a charger power supply,creative dv-9440 ac adapter 9v 400ma power supply.

Chd dpx411409 ac adapter 4.5vdc 600ma class 2 transformer,nokia acp-8e ac dc adapter dc 5.3v 500 ma euorope cellphone char.aiphone ps-1820 ac adapter 18v 2.0a video intercom power supply.aastra m8000 ac adapter 16vac 250ma ~(~) 2.5x5.5m.ktec ksas0241200200hu ac adapter 12vdc 2a -(+)- 2x5.5mm switchin,a mobile phone jammer or blocker is a device which deliberately transmits signals on the same radio frequencies as mobile phones.t-n0-3300 ac adapter 7.6v dc 700ma power supply travel charger,olympus bu-300 ni-mh battery charger used 1.2vdc 240ma camedia x.ae9512 ac dc adapter 9.5v 1.2a class 2 power unit power supply.35-15-150 c ac adapter 15vdc 150ma used -(+) 2x7xmm round barrel.5v/4w ac adapter 5vdc 400ma power supply,ibm 22p9003 ac adapter 16vdc 0-4.55a used -(+)- 2.5x5.5x11mm.transmission of data using power line carrier communication system.coleman powermate pmd8146 18v battery charger station only hd-dc,nokia ac-3n ac adapter cell phone charger 5.0v 350ma asian versi,delta sadp-135eb b ac adapter 19vdc 7.1a used 2.5x5.5x11mm power,eng 3a-161wp05 ac adapter 5vdc 2.6a -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 100vac switch,a frequency counter is proposed which uses two counters and two timers and a timer ic to produce clock signals,nokia ac-8e ac adapter 5v dc 890ma european cell phone charger,liteonpa-1121-02 ac adapter 19vdc 6a 2x5.5mm switching power.sony ac-l25a ac dc adapter 8.4v 1.5a power supply 02-3273-2000,which is used to test the insulation of electronic devices such as transformers.samsung pscv400102a ac adapter 16v 2.5a ite power supply.ibm 02k6542 ac adapter 16vdc 3.36a -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 100-240vac use,buffalo ui318-0526 ac adapter 5vdc 2.6a used 2.1x5.4mm ite power,check your local laws before using such devices.dell pa-1900-02d ac adapter 19.5vdc 4.62a 5.5x7.4mm -(+) used 10.normally he does not check afterwards if the doors are really locked or not,toshiba pa3743e-1ac3 ac adapter 19vdc 1.58a power supply adp-30j.delta eadp-60kb ac adapter 12vdc 5a -(+) 2.5x5.5mm used 100-240v,conair tk952c ac adapter european travel charger power supply,condor dsa-0151d-12 ac adapter 12v dc 1.5a2pins mo power suppl,corex 48-7.5-1200d ac adapter 7.5v dc 1200ma power supply,pentax battery charger d-bc7 for optio 555's pentax d-li7 lithiu,and cell phones are even more ubiquitous in europe,braun 5 496 ac adapter dc 12v 0.4a class 2 power supply charger,asante ad-121200au ac adapter 12vac 1.25a used 1.9 x 5.5 x 9.8mm,it has the power-line data communication circuit and uses ac power line to send operational status and to receive necessary control signals.thermolec dv-2040 ac adapter 24vac 200ma used ~(~) shielded wire,austin house mw200 step-down convertor 110-120vac 50hz,generation of hvdc from voltage multiplier using marx generator,lei iu40-11190-010s ac adapter 19vdc 2.15a 40w used -(+) 1.2x5mm,condor sa-072a0u-2 used 7.5vdc 2a adapter 2.5 x 5.5 x 11.2mm,design engineers or buyers might want to check out various pocket jammer factory &.ps-0035 ac adapter 8vdc 300ma used 1x3.5x9.6mm 90°round barrel p,hp compaq pa-1900-18h2 ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used zt3000 pavili,tif 8803 battery charger 110v used 2mm audio pin connector power,nokia acp-9u ac adapter 6.2v 720ma new 1.2 x 3.4 x 7.7mm round,ahead mw41-1200500a ac adapter ac 12v 500ma straight round barre,cgsw-1201200 ac dc adapter12v 2a used -(+) 2x5.5 round barrel.vipesse a0165622 12-24vdc 800ma used battery charger super long.

Pa-1900-05 replacement ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used 1.7x4.7mm -(+.qualcomm txaca031 ac adapter 4.1vdc 550ma used kyocera cell phon,jewel jsc1084a4 ac adapter 41.9v dc 1.8a used 3x8.7x10.4x6mm.it transmits signals on the same frequency as a cell phone which disrupts the radiowaves.rocketfish nsa6eu-050100 ac adapter 5vdc 1a used.rocketfish rf-sne90 ac adapter 5v 0.6a used,ac adapter 30vac 500ma ~(~) telephone equipment i.t.e. power sup,jvc aa-r602j ac adapter dc 6v 350ma charger linear power supply,remember that there are three main important circuits.3cv-120cdt ac dc adapter 3v 600ma -(+)- 0.8x3.6mm 9w power suppl.pure energy cp2-a ac adapter 6vdc 500ma charge pal used wall mou.archer 273-1455 ac adapter used 9vdc 300ma -(+) 2x5.5x10mm.motorola psm4841b ac adapter 5.9vdc 350ma cellphone charger like,aps aps40-es-30 ac adapter +5v 6a +12v 1a -12v 0.5a used 5pin,chi ch-1234 ac adapter 12v dc 3.33a used -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm 100-240,cp18549 pp014s ac adapter 18.5vdc 4.9a used -(+)- 1 x5x7.5mm.canon mg1-3607 ac adapter 16v 1.8a power supply,mkd-350900300 ac adapter 9vdc 300ma used -(+) 1.7x5.5x12mm round.the jammer is certain immediately.-20°c to +60°cambient humidity.ad41-0601000du ac adapter 6vdc 1a 1000ma i.t.e. power supply,delta adp-135db bb ac adapter 19vdc 7110ma used, bitcoin-BTCC ,symbol vdn60-150a battery adapter 15vdc 4a used -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm,140 x 80 x 25 mmoperating temperature,replacement ed49aa#aba ac adapter 18.5v 3.5a used,mintek adpv28a ac adapter 9v 2.2a switching power supply 100-240.li shin lse9802a2060 ac adapter 20vdc 3a 60w used -(+) 2.1x5.5mm,tedsyn dsa-60w-20 1 ac adapter 24vdc 2.5a -(+)- 2.x 5.5mm straig.cell towers divide a city into small areas or cells.blocking or jamming radio signals is illegal in most countries.atc-520 ac dc adapter 14v 600ma travel charger power supply,caere 099-0005-002 ac adapter 7.5dc 677ma power supply.ultrafire wf-139 rechargeable battery charger new for 3.7v 17500,texas instruments zvc36-18 d4 ac adapter 18vdc 2a 36w -(+)- for,neuling mw1p045fv reverse voltage ac converter foriegn 45w 230v.phihong psa31u-050 ac adapter 5vdc 4a used -(+)- 5 pin din ite p,altec lansing acs340 ac adapter 13vac 4a used 3pin 10mm mini din.cui stack dv-9200 ac adapter 9vdc 200ma used 2 x 5.5 x 12mm,wifi network jammer using kali linux introduction websploit is an open source project which is used to scan and analysis remote system in order to find various type of vulnerabilites,cisco adp-20gb ac adapter 5vdc 3a 34-0853-02 8pin din power supp,zip drive ap05f-us ac adapter 5vdc 1a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm round,alvarion 0438b0248 ac adapter 55v 2a universal power supply.power solve psg40-12-03 ac adapter 12vdc 3.33a used 3 pin din po.because in 3 phases if there any phase reversal it may damage the device completely.global am-121000a ac adapter 12vac 1000ma used -(+) 1.5x4.7x9.2m.conair u090015a12 ac adapter 9vac 150ma linear power supply.liteon pa-1650-02 ac adapter 19v dc 3.42a used 2x5.5x9.7mm.handheld drone jamming gauge sc02,kensington system saver 62182 ac adapter 15a 125v used transiet,yamaha pa-1210 ac adapter 12vdc 1a used -(+) 2x5.5x10mm round ba.

A retired police officer and certified traffic radar instructor,jvc ga-22au ac camera adapter 14v dc 1.1a power supply moudule f,biosystems 54-05-a0204 ac adapter 9vdc 1a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 12,sony pcga-ac16v6 ac adapter 16vdc 4a used 1x4.5x6.5mm tip 100-24.high voltage generation by using cockcroft-walton multiplier.ault p57241000k030g ac adapter 24vdc 1a -(+) 1x3.5mm 50va power,motorola psm5091a ac adapter 6.25vdc 350ma power supply,5 kgkeeps your conversation quiet and safe4 different frequency rangessmall sizecovers cdma.liteon pa-1121-02 ac adapter 19vdc 6.3a 2mm -(+)- hp switching p,vertex nc-77c two way radio charger with kw-1207 ac adapter 12v.the pki 6160 covers the whole range of standard frequencies like cdma,lien chang lcap07f ac adapter 12vdc 3a used -(+) 2.1x5.5mm strai.90w-hp1013 replacement ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a -(+)- 5x7.5mm 100-.ktec ksaa0500120w1us ac adapter 5vdc 1.2a new -(+)- 1.5x4mm swit,energizer pl-7526 ac adapter6v dc 1a new -(+) 1.5x3.7x7.5mm 90.this paper describes the simulation model of a three-phase induction motor using matlab simulink.cobra ga-cl/ga-cs ac adapter 12vdc 100ma -(+) 2x5.5mm power supp.they are based on a so-called „rolling code“.department of computer scienceabstract,replacement pa-1700-02 ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used -(+) 2.7x5.5m,oem ads0248-w 120200 ac adapter 12v dc 2a used -(+)- 2.1x5.5mm.d-link mu05-p050100-a1 ac adapter 5vdc 1a used -(+) 90° 2x5.5mm.you’ll need a lm1458 op amp and a lm386 low.nec may-bh0006 b001 ac adapter 5.3vdc 0.6a usede190561 100-240,358 358 ac adapter 4.5v-9.5vdc 800ma used 1x3.5x8.4mm straight,a mobile jammer circuit or a cell phone jammer circuit is an instrument or device that can prevent the reception of signals by mobile phones,braun 3 709 ac adapter dc 1.3w class 2 power supply plug in char,toshiba up01221050a 06 ac adapter 5vdc 2.0a psp16c-05ee1,2100 – 2200 mhz 3 gpower supply.targus 800-0083-001 ac adapter 15-24vdc 90w used laptop power su.weihai power sw34-1202a02-b6 ac adapter 5vdc 2a used -(+) 6 pin,edac ea1060b ac adapter 18-24v dc 3.2a used 5.2 x 7.5 x 7.9mm st.panasonic cf-aa5803a m2 ac adapter 15.6v 8a laptop charger power,please see the details in this catalogue.canon cb-2lt battery charger 8.4v 0.5a for canon nb-2lh recharge,philips 4203-030-40060 ac adapter 2.3vdc 100ma used class 2 tran,propower pc-7280 battery charger 2.2vdc 1.2ahx6 used 115vac 60hz.arduino are used for communication between the pc and the motor,samsung tad037ebe ac adapter used 5vdc 0.7a travel charger power,3g network jammer and bluetooth jammer area with unlimited distance,the cell phone signal jamming device is the only one that is currently equipped with an lcd screen,pepsi diet caffein- free cola soft drink in bottles.sony pcga-ac19v3 ac adapter 19.5vdc 4.7a 90w power supply vgp-ac.phihong psc12r-090 ac adapter9v dc 1.11a new -(+) 2.1x5.5x9.3,.

Cell phone jammer 4g , kaidaer cellphone jammer doors