Best wifi blocker | wifi blocker Saint-Félicien
Two are better than one Multi-GNSS will open up PPP to a much wider range of applications. By Francesco Basile, Terry Moore, Chris Hill, Gary McGraw and Andrew Johnson INNOVATION INSIGHTS by Richard Langley ARE WE THERE? In a multi-GNSS world, that is. We’ve asked that question from time to time in this column over the years. So, are we there yet? That depends. One definition of “multi” is more than one. In this sense, we were in a multi-GNSS world as long ago as 1996. In that year, we had two fully populated constellations of satellites: GPS and GLONASS. Unfortunately, the full GLONASS constellation was short-lived. Russia’s economic difficulties following the dissolution of the Soviet Union hurt GLONASS, and by 2002 the constellation had dropped to as few as seven satellites. But GLONASS was reborn, and by Dec. 8, 2011, a full 24-satellite constellation was again operational. But another meaning of “multi” is many, implying more than two. In the late 1990s, the first satellites to host transponders for satellite-based augmentation systems were launched. So, by the mid-2000s, even though GLONASS was still undergoing its rejuvenation, we were already in a three-constellation world. And receivers then on the market provided the necessary raw measurement data to yield positioning solutions from this system of systems with potentially more continuity and greater accuracy than those obtained using GPS alone. And so in July 2008, we featured the article “The Future is Now: GPS + GLONASS + SBAS = GNSS.” And then in June 2010, we had “GPS, GLONASS, and More: Multiple Constellation Processing in the International GNSS Service.” In the introduction to that article, we asked that same question: Are we there yet? We concluded that, for early adopters of GPS plus GLONASS data and products, we were. With Galileo test satellites in orbit and an early version of the BeiDou system operational, it was already clear that by the end of the current decade, it wouldn’t just be the early adopters who would be benefiting from multi-GNSS but virtually all users of satellite-based positioning and navigation. Although we aren’t quite there with fully operational Galileo and BeiDou constellations, we are getting pretty close. And so researchers are looking hard at how to make the best use of multiple-constellation observations in a variety of positioning and navigation scenarios. In this month’s column, a team of such researchers examines the potential benefit of combining GPS and Galileo observations for improving precise point positioning in urban environments, following the advice we read in the Book of Ecclesiastes: “Two are better than one.” Over the years, precise point positioning (PPP) has been applied to many real-time applications that require sub-decimeter-level accuracy over a wide area or on a global scale. It is currently a standard in scenarios characterized by open-sky conditions, where a receiver is likely to have continuous track of GNSS satellites. On the other hand, PPP’s typically long convergence time means the technique has not been widely used in constrained and transient signal environments associated with urban areas. Analysis with both simulated and real data has shown that, once Galileo reaches final operational status, the PPP convergence time will be cut by more than half when using both GPS and Galileo observations. Accordingly, multi-GNSS will open up PPP to a much wider range of applications. To begin, we assessed the positioning performance of GPS and Galileo signals, alone or used together, in open-sky conditions. A Simulink-based software simulator was used to simulate 24-hour-long observation sessions from 10 static (fixed location) receivers spread worldwide, which were then processed with the POINT software (developed by the University of Nottingham and three other British universities) in static (receiver assumed fixed) PPP mode with an elevation cutoff angle of 10° and with carrier-phase ambiguities estimated as real or floating-point values. For each station, the simulator was run 55 times to provide a sufficient number of data points to characterize the general behavior of the processing algorithms; therefore, a total of 550 points were considered. For better GPS-Galileo interoperability, PPP results based on the ionosphere-free (IF) combination between GPS L1 and L5 and Galileo E1 and E5a observables were considered. The metrics used to define the positioning performance are the errors in the north, east and down components of the position once all of a daily file has been processed and the time these errors take to converge below 10 centimeters. The open-sky condition always guarantees excellent geometry and signal continuity even considering only one constellation. PPP Results. TABLE 1 shows the root mean square (RMS) of the errors and convergence times of the three components of position for the different configurations for the 550 points considered. Both single- and dual-constellation systems are able to provide a sub-decimeter-level accuracy after a few tens of minutes. On average, positioning with Galileo E1-E5a IF performs better that GPS L1-L5 IF: the Galileo solution is more accurate and converges faster than the GPS solution. TABLE 1. Comparison between GPS-only, Galileo-only and GPS plus Galileo PPP results. RMS of the positioning errors and convergence times for the stations considered. The reason for this behavior is the assumed lower noise on Galileo pseudoranges. It is well known that the quality of the pseudoranges affects the convergence time of the PPP solution. For this reason, one would expect some improvements by employing the Galileo Alternative BOC (AltBOC) modulated E5 signal. Thanks to its very large signal bandwidth of at least 51 MHz, Galileo E5 is characterized by excellent rejection properties of both long-range and short-range multipath. However, as shown in Table 1, when comparing the PPP solutions obtained using the Galileo E1-E5 IF and E1-E5a IF combinations, they have nearly the same performance. The reason for this apparent contradiction can be found in the use of the IF combination with E1. Given that E1 represents the dominant source of error in the IF combinations, its noise is amplified by a factor of 2.34 in the IF combination with E5 and by a factor of 2.26 when combined with E5a. Also, the smaller errors (with respect to E1) in E5a are amplified by 1.26, while the one in E5 is amplified by 1.34. Therefore, depending on the noise level in the Galileo pseudoranges, there might be instances where the noise in the E1-E5 IF combination is close to the one in the E1-E5a IF combination. The number and the geometry of the observed satellites also affect the convergence time. For this reason, when using the two systems together, the time the vertical errors take to go below 10 centimeters was reduced by 50 percent with respect to the GPS-only case and by 18 percent with respect to the Galileo-only case. URBAN ENVIRONMENTS The poor signal visibility and continuity associated with urban environments, together with the slow (re)convergence time of PPP, usually make the technique unsuitable for land navigation in cities. However, as demonstrated in the previous section, using a dual-constellation not only improves the visibility conditions, but also reduces the PPP convergence time. Therefore, it might be possible to extend the applicability of PPP to land navigation in certain urban areas. To assess the positioning performance of two-constellation GNSS in these constrained environments, we analyzed the signal availability and geometry of five different simulated sites in the neighborhood of the University College London (UCL) campus. We adopted building boundaries, which determine the minimum elevation angles above which GNSS signals can be received due to building obstruction. FIGURES 1 and 2 illustrate the location and the building boundaries for each site. FIGURE 3 shows the junction (site B) between Gower Street (site A) and University Street (site C). FIGURE 1. Locations of the urban sites that are considered in the analysis. FIGURE 2. Building obstruction masks controlling satellite visibility for each site. FIGURE 3. Google Map image showing the junction (site B) between Gower Street (site A) and University Street (site C) in the midst of the University College London main campus. When processing data from multi-constellation GNSS, the differences between the system time of the different constellations need to be considered. For this reason, when GPS and Galileo are used simultaneously for precise positioning, the Kalman filter state vector (in general) includes the three position components, the receiver clock offset, and the GPS-Galileo Time Offset (GGTO) — whether or not a predicted value might be available in a navigation message from one of the constellations. On the other hand, in PPP processing, the multi-constellation precise products used are based on the same system time, and therefore, in theory, it is not necessary to estimate the GGTO. However, existing intersystem biases may affect the PPP performance, and so it is advisable to estimate them in the Kalman filter. Traditionally in PPP, the state vector also includes the residual zenith wet tropospheric delay and the carrier-phase ambiguities. Therefore, the minimum number of satellites required for GPS plus Galileo PPP is six. The geometry conditions are also an important factor for assessing the GNSS positioning performance. For land navigation, the horizontal dilution of precision (HDOP), which provides information about the achievable horizontal precision (and, assuming a bias-free solution, accuracy), is particularly relevant. For many land applications, such as precision agriculture and urban positioning, horizontal accuracy is more critical than vertical accuracy. Assuming that the ranging error in the carrier phase is 20 centimeters, to have decimeter-level horizontal accuracy HDOP needs to be no larger than 5. In most cases, HDOP values as small as 2 are desired. TABLE 2 gives an overview of the visibility and geometry conditions at the selected sites. A dual-constellation (GPS and Galileo) receiver placed at one of the two road junctions will always, or almost always, see at least six satellites with an HDOP better than 5. At sites A and C, these minimum requirements for signal availability and geometry are met for more than 75 percent of the day. Obstructions due to high buildings, such as at site E, allows us to have at least six satellites for only 13 percent of the time. TABLE 2. Percentage of epochs in 24 hours for which dual-constellation GNSS meets the minimum visibility (number of satellites, N) and geometry requirements (horizontal dilution of precision, HDOP). From our preliminary study, it seems clear that high-accuracy positioning in urban environments is possible, but only in some areas where buildings are relatively short, providing good signal availability and geometry. Things can slightly improve by considering additional systems, such as GLONASS and BeiDou, and by exploiting the non-line-of-sight (reflected) signals. However, it is well known that an additional obstacle for PPP in urban environments is signal discontinuity. Indeed, when a GNSS receiver loses lock on the carrier, the positioning filter needs to be reinitialized, meaning that further tens of minutes are required before reconvergence. To test the reconvergence time of PPP in transient signal environments, a pedestrian carrying a multi-GNSS receiver was simulated to be walking along the path in FIGURE 4. The receiver was simulated to be located for the first half hour of the simulation in the front yard of UCL’s Wilkins Building (where the simulation begins and ends), before starting to move. This is to allow the initial convergence of the PPP filter. FIGURE 4. The measured trajectory of the simulated pedestrian kinematic test. FIGURE 5 shows the visibility for a given GNSS satellite. Only the epochs when the receiver is moving are considered. Therefore, the first 30 minutes, when the receiver is static, are not included in the plot. Data gaps due to building obstructions are visible, with the largest being about 12 minutes and the average less than 2 minutes. As a consequence, the carrier-phase ambiguities need to be estimated all over again; and, as previously mentioned, this process usually requires tens of minutes before reconvergence. FIGURE 5. Satellite availability during the kinematic test. FIGURE 6 shows the HDOP and the number of visible satellites for the kinematic test, while FIGURE 7 shows the RMS, over 50 simulations, of the horizontal components of the positioning error when GPS L1 and L2 and Galileo E1 and E5, linearly combined into the IF combination, are processed in kinematic PPP mode with the POINT software. At the beginning of the kinematic test, when the HDOP is well below 5, the horizontal error is at the centimeter level, while, after 33 minutes from the beginning of the simulation, building obstructions don’t permit a converged solution below the 20-centimeter accuracy level. FIGURE 6. Horizontal dilution of precision and number of visible satellites for the kinematic test. FIGURE 7. RMS of the position errors for the kinematic test. This short example clearly demonstrates that two-constellation PPP has, in theory, the potential to precisely navigate ground vehicles in some urban environments; however, it is too sensitive to signal discontinuity. Slow solution reconvergence to the few decimeter/centimeter level still represents the main limitation to the use of PPP for high-accuracy applications in cities. Nonetheless, GPS plus Galileo PPP easily enables sub-meter-level horizontal accuracy for most of the simulations we have carried out. After signal loss, it only took a few tens of seconds to have a horizontal accuracy of better than a meter. SMOOTHED CORRECTIONS As an alternative to ambiguity-fixing methods aimed to improve the (re)convergence time, we propose a method that mitigates the effect of the ionosphere and which thereby reduces the reconvergence time of the PPP solution after initial convergence has been achieved. In this new approach, while the two-frequency carrier phases are linearly combined in the traditional IF combination, the uncombined pseudoranges are corrected by a pre-smoothed ionospheric delay (via a Hatch filter), computed using the geometry-free combination of two-frequency pseudoranges. Once the Hatch filter has converged, ideally we have IF pseudoranges with lower noise than the traditional ones. Therefore, in case the PPP filter needs to restart, we can obtain a quicker reconvergence thanks to the lower noise on the ionosphere-corrected pseudoranges. Indeed, provided that the signal gap is not very large, the ionosphere smoothing filter doesn’t need to be restarted from the raw values. It is possible to predict the ionospheric delay computed from two-frequency carrier-phase measurements using a linear fitting model from previous measurements within a sliding time window. As an example, high-rate data recorded on July 25, 2017, from station DAEJ in Daejeon, Republic of Korea, were used to analyze the ionosphere prediction error. In FIGURES 8 and 9, the RMS of the prediction errors for different time windows have been plotted against the data gap length. The prediction error depends on both the time latency of the observation and the elevation angle of the satellite. It increases with the data gap length, but larger time windows can damp the divergence of the error. A time window of 120 seconds was used both for satellites above and below 30° elevation angle. In this case, the error for a 5-minute prediction is about 4 centimeters for a satellite above 30° and 7 centimeters for satellites with a low elevation angle. These values are much smaller than the noise in the pseudorange measurements and can, therefore, be neglected. FIGURE 8. RMS of the prediction errors vs. data gap length for satellite elevation angles greater than 30°. FIGURE 9. RMS of the prediction errors vs. data gap length for satellite elevation angles less than than 30°. Multi-Frequency Combinations. The method introduced in the previous section allows users to be free from the constraint of IF observables and, therefore, to look for multi-frequency combinations aimed to minimize the noise on the pseudoranges. The next-generation GNSS satellites will broadcast open signals over three frequencies. The triple-frequency, geometry-preserving combination aimed to reduce the noise, instead of mitigating the ionosphere, can be used for positioning purposes. TABLE 3 summarizes the assumed values for the ratios ni between the noise on different GPS and Galileo pseudoranges and the ones on L1/ E1. FIGURE 10 shows a color map of the noise amplification factor associated with different linear combinations between GPS L1, L2 and L5. The x-axis is α3, the coefficient multiplying the pseudorange on L5 in the combination, while the y-axis is the ionosphere amplification factor of the triple-frequency combination with respect to L1, q. The noise for this combination can be as little as 0.57 times the noise on L1, while the corresponding ionosphere amplification factor is 1.49. Once the smoothed ionosphere correction has converged, we can potentially have an IF pseudorange 81 percent less noisy than the L1-L2 IF, and, therefore, a much faster reconvergence. TABLE 3. Assumed noise, ni, on GPS and Galileo pseudoranges, i, and their ionospheric delay, q, with respect to L1/ E1. FIGURE 10. Geometry-preserving surface in the space q-α3-n (ionosphere amplification factor – L5 pseudorange multiplier – noise amplification factor) for GPS L1-L2-L5 combinations. Similar conclusions can be drawn by considering Galileo signals. Using triple-frequency combinations with E1, E5a and E5b, we can obtain 81 percent less noise than E1-E5a IF, while a reduction of the noise in the IF pseudorange up to 90 percent was observed using E5 alone. Triple-frequency combinations involving E5 don’t bring such large improvements with respect to using E5 alone. Indeed, a maximum of 16 percent less noise can be registered when combining E1, E5a and E5 with respect to the E5 uncombined case. TABLE 4 illustrates the minimum noise amplification factor for each triple-frequency combination and its ionosphere amplification factor. TABLE 4. Minimum noise achievable through GPS and Galileo triple-frequency pseudorange combinations and their ionospheric delay with respect to L1/ E1. The noise associated with the ionosphere-corrected multi-frequency pseudorange combination is as large as meter level before converging to centimeter level. For this reason, a proper weighting method, which considers the varying noise on the ionosphere correction, needs to be employed. To test the benefit of the new approach for the reconvergence time, three hours of simulated GPS and Galileo data from a static site in La Misere, Seychelles, were processed with the POINT software in kinematic mode. After 90 minutes, the PPP filter was forced to restart to simulate reconvergence. The multipath time constant was set to 5 seconds, which is a typical value for kinematic multipath. The performance of the traditional L1- L2 IF combination was compared with the triple-frequency pseudorange combination, corrected by the smoothed ionosphere delay coming from the Hatch filter. FIGURE 11 shows the precision (RMS error over 50 simulations) of the horizontal components after filter restart. The new approach has much faster reconvergence than the traditional PPP method based on the IF combination. Indeed, while the traditional method takes about 11 minutes to have a horizontal error below 10 centimeters, using the low-noise combination, this accuracy is achieved after 171 seconds. Even better performance can be achieved considering the Galileo E5 signal (see FIGURE 12). FIGURE 11. RMS error of the horizontal position components of static site using GPS data after filter restart. FIGURE 12. RMS error of the horizontal position components of static site using Galileo data after filter restart. The E1-E5 IF combination requires 10 minutes for the horizontal convergence, while using E5 with the Hatch filter we have the horizontal solution converged in about 30 seconds. It is worth noticing that in the presence of static multipath, the proposed weighting method may lead to an overly optimistic weighting of the pseudorange measurements in the PPP filter and to a slower reconvergence of the positioning solution. Indeed, the long correlation time in the static multipath, of the order of a few minutes, makes it hard to filter out by the Hatch filter, hence the corrected measurements have larger errors than expected. The effect of static multipath in the new configuration is visible in FIGURE 13, where the reconvergence of the horizontal component for the L1-L2 IF combination is compared with the new approach. In this case, the time constant of the simulated multipath was set to 1 minute. In this scenario, the triple-frequency low-noise combination corrected by the smoothed ionosphere combination quickly converges below 20 centimeters; however, it takes significantly longer than the L1-L2 IF combination to reach the 10-centimeter accuracy level. FIGURE 13. RMS error of horizontal position component of static site using GPS data after filter restart with 1-minute multipath time constant. Also, the new method was tested with the kinematic simulation as in the previous section. Here, the GPS triple-frequency combined pseudorange and Galileo E5 pseudorange (both corrected with the smoothed ionosphere) are processed in kinematic PPP mode with the POINT software. FIGURE 14 compares the RMS of the horizontal errors with the IF configuration. Less than a minute after the receiver lost lock on the satellites, the solution reconverged below the 20-centimeter level, while it took less than 30 seconds to go below 50 centimeters. FIGURE 14. RMS error of the horizontal position components of kinematic trajectory using GPS and Galileo data and the smoothed ionosphere approach after filter restart. CONCLUSIONS In this article, we described a comparison that we carried out between GPS-only, Galileo-only and GPS plus Galileo PPP. Results based on simulated open-sky conditions demonstrated that Galileo performs better than GPS thanks to an assumed lower E1-E5a IF noise with respect to L1-L5. Two-constellation PPP enables faster (re)convergence compared to the single constellation case. An analysis of GNSS signal availability, continuity and satellite geometry was also performed to study the feasibility of PPP in urban environments. Preliminary results, based on simulations, showed that dual-constellation (GPS plus Galileo) PPP is possible in urban areas with relatively short buildings in which a satellite minimum availability requirement is met most of the time. However, signal discontinuity still represents the major problem for traditional PPP in urban environments, due to long reconvergence times. Finally, we proposed a new PPP configuration based on triple-frequency combinations, intended to minimize the noise on the pseudorange and corrected by a smoothed ionospheric delay. This configuration seems to provide faster reconvergence than the traditional PPP with the IF combination if applied to kinematic scenarios. In static applications, the very slow varying multipath error makes the proposed weighting method, based on the error in the smoothed ionosphere correction, overly optimistic. In such cases, the IF combination reconverges more quickly to high-accuracy levels better than 20 centimeters. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research described in this article was sponsored through a studentship agreement between the University of Nottingham and Rockwell Collins UK Limited. The article is based on the paper “Multi-Frequency Precise Point Positioning Using GPS and Galileo Data with Smoothed Ionospheric Corrections” presented at the 2018 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, held in Monterey, California, April 23–26, 2018. All figures attributed to the authors unless otherwise specified. MANUFACTURERS The receiver at station DAEJ is a Trimble NetR9. FRANCESCO BASILE is a postgraduate research student at the Nottingham Geospatial Institute of the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. He received his M.Sc. in space and astronautic engineering from the University of Rome – La Sapienza and his B.Sc. in aerospace engineering from the University of Naples – Federico II, both in Italy. TERRY MOORE is the director of the Nottingham Geospatial Institute where he is the Professor of Satellite Navigation. He is a fellow and the president of the Royal Institute of Navigation (RIN) and also a fellow and a member of council of the Institute of Navigation (ION). CHRIS HILL is an associate professor in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Nottingham and a member of the Nottingham Geospatial Institute research group. He holds a Ph.D. in satellite laser ranging and he is a fellow of the RIN. GARY MCGRAW is a technical fellow with the Rockwell Collins Advanced Technology Center in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. McGraw is a fellow of the ION and is a senior member of the IEEE. ANDREW JOHNSON is a chief engineer at Rockwell Collions UK in Winnersh, Berkshire, United Kingdom. Johnson has a B.Sc. in electronic and electrical engineering from the University of Surrey in Guildford, United Kingdom. FURTHER READING Authors’ Conference Paper “Multi-Frequency Precise Point Positioning Using GPS and Galileo Data with Smoothed Ionospheric Corrections” by F. Basile, T. Moore, C. Hill, G. McGraw and A. Johnson in Proceedings of PLANS 2018, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers / Institute of Navigation Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, Monterey, California, April 23–26, 2018, pp. 1388–1398, doi: 10.1109/PLANS.2018.8373531. Multi-Constellation Use in Built-up Areas “Making It Better: Low-Cost Single-Frequency Positioning in Urban Environments” by I. Smolyakov and R.B. Langley in GPS World, Vol. 29, No. 5, May 2018, pp. 42–48. “Quo Vademus: Future Automotive GNSS Positioning in Urban Scenarios” by M. Escher, M. Stanisak and U. Bestmann in GPS World, Vol. 27, No. 5, May 2016, pp. 46–52. “Multi-Constellation GNSS Performance Evaluation for Urban Canyons Using Large Virtual Reality City Models” by L. Wang, P.D. Groves and M.K. Ziebart in Journal of Navigation, Vol. 65, No. 3, July 2012, pp. 459–476, doi: 10.1017/S0373463312000082. “Potential Benefits of GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO Integration in an Urban Canyon – Hong Kong” by S. Ji, W. Chen, X. Ding, Y. Chen, C. Zhao and C. Hu in Journal of Navigation, Vol. 63, No. 4, October 2010, pp. 681–693, doi: 10.1017/S0373463310000081. Multi-Constellation Use in Aviation Applications “Assessment of Alternative Positioning Solution Architectures for Dual Frequency Multi-Constellation GNSS/SBAS” by G. McGraw, B.A. Schnaufer, P.Y. Hwang and M.J. Armatys in Proceedings of ION GNSS+ 2013, the 26th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Nashville, Tennessee, Sept. 16–20, 2013, pp. 223–232. Advances in Precise Point Positioning “More Is Better: Instantaneous Centimeter-Level Multi-Frequency Precise Point Positioning” by D. Laurichesse and S. Banville in GPS World, Vol. 29, No. 7, July 2018, pp. 42–47. “Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Going?: Examining Precise Point Positioning Now and in the Future” by S. Bisnath, J. Aggrey, G. Seepersad and M. Gill in GPS World, Vol. 29, No. 3, March 2018, pp. 41–48. “Undifferenced GPS Ambiguity Resolution Using the Decoupled Clock Model and Ambiguity Datum Fixing” by P. Collins, S. Bisnath, F. Lahaye, and P. Héroux in Navigation, Vol. 57, No. 2, Summer 2010, pp. 123–135, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-4296.2010.tb01772.x. “Integer Ambiguity Resolution on Undifferenced GPS Phase Measurements and Its Application to PPP and Satellite Precise Orbit Determination” by D. Laurichesse, F. Mercier, J.-P. Berthias, P. Broca and L. Cerri in Navigation, Vol. 56, No. 2, Summer 2009, pp. 135–149, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-4296.2009.tb01750.x. Hatch Filter “Combinations of Observations” by A. Hauschild, Chapter 20 in Springer Handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems, edited by P.J.G. Teunissen and O. Montenbruck, published by Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland, 2017. “The Synergism of GPS Code and Carrier Measurements” by R. Hatch in Proceedings of the Third International Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Doppler Positioning, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Feb. 8–12, 1982, Vol. II, pp. 1213–1232. Dilution of Precision “Dilution of Precision” by R.B. Langley in GPS World, Vol. 10, No. 5, May 1999, pp. 52–59. Kalman Filtering “Least-Squares Estimation and Kalman Filtering” by S. Verhagen and P.J.G. Teunissen, Chapter 22 in Springer Handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems, edited by P.J.G. Teunissen and O. Montenbruck, published by Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland, 2017. “The Kalman Filter: Navigation’s Integration Workhorse” by L.J. Levy in GPS World, Vol., No., September 1997, pp. 65–71.
best wifi blocker
Ii mobile jammermobile jammer is used to prevent mobile phones from receiving or transmitting signals with the base station,hp pa-1900-32ht ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used ppp012l-e.ac adapter mw35-0900300 9vdc 300ma -(+) 1.5x3.5x8mm 120vac class,ault pw118 ac adapter 5v 3a i.t.e power supply,an indication of the location including a short description of the topography is required.hoioto ads-45np-12-1 12036g ac adapter 12vdc 3a used -(+) 2x5.5x.this project shows a temperature-controlled system,jvc aa-v15u ac power adapter 8.5v 1.3a 23w battery charger,delta ga240pe1-00 ac ddapter 19.5vdc 12.3a used 5x7.4mm dell j21,replacement pa-10 ac adapter 19.5v 4.62a used 5 x 7.4 x 12.3mm,toshiba pa3378e-1aca ac adapter 15vdc 5a used 3 x 6.5 x 9.7 mm s.replacement seb100p2-15.0 ac adapter 15vdc 8a 4pin used pa3507u-,component telephone u060030d12 ac adapter 6vdc 300ma power suppl,ea11603 universal ac adapter 150w 18-24v 7.5a laptop power suppl.black&decker versapak vp131 4.3v battery charger for versapak ba.the pki 6400 is normally installed in the boot of a car with antennas mounted on top of the rear wings or on the roof,finecom 34w-12-5 ac adapter 5vdc 12v 2a 6pin 9mm mini din dual v,kingpro kad-0112018d ac adapter 12vdc 1.5a power supply.this paper shows the real-time data acquisition of industrial data using scada,transmission of data using power line carrier communication system,delta adp-50gh rev.b ac adapter 12vdc 4.16a used 2 x 5.5 x 9.5mm.cui stack dv-1280 ac adapter 12vdc 800ma used 1.9x5.4x12.1mm,conair sa28-12a ac adapter 4.4vdc 120ma 4.8w power supply,the complete system is integrated in a standard briefcase,opti pa-225 ac adapter +5vdc +12vdc 4pins switching power supply,creative ys-1015-e12 12v 1.25a switching power supply ac adapter,intelligent jamming of wireless communication is feasible and can be realised for many scenarios using pki’s experience.this covers the covers the gsm and dcs,samsung ad-6019a ac adapter 19vdc 3.15a laptop power supply,neonpro sps-60-12-c 60w 12vdc 5a 60ew ul led power supply hyrite,dve dsa-36w-12 3 24 ac adapter 12vdc 2a -(+) 2x5.5mm 100-240vac.wifi blocker Saint-Félicien | 5673 |
wifi blocker Saint-Gabriel | 1471 |
jamming neighbor wifi usb | 625 |
wifi cooling fan | 750 |
jamming neighbor wifi hacker | 6620 |
jamming wifi legal costs pledge | 5513 |
jamming neighbor wifi hacking | 4826 |
wifi blocker Abbotsford | 1928 |
wifi blocker Lévis | 2219 |
wifi blocker Preston | 4034 |
wifi blocker free | 3902 |
wifi blocker Léry | 3422 |
wifi blocker Brownsburg-Chatham | 3807 |
wifi 900 | 8708 |
wifi störsender | 8868 |
wifi blocker Nanaimo | 1349 |
jamming neighbor wifi vs | 6081 |
wifi jamming Ontario | 3260 |
best cheap spy camera | 8717 |
wifi blocker jammer device | 6617 |
wifi interrupter app | 8578 |
jamming wifi legal group | 2532 |
wifi blocker Victoriaville | 7929 |
best electronic bug detector | 6577 |
wifi blocker Greater Sudbury | 727 |
wifi blocker Saint-Joseph-de-Sorel | 2374 |
neighbors jamming wifi booster | 816 |
best gps blocker | 5580 |
jamming neighbor wifi mouse | 8128 |
wifi 900mhz | 5705 |
Vertex nc-77c two way radio charger with kw-1207 ac adapter 12v.delta adp-90cd db ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used -(+)- 1.5x5.5x11mm.cell towers divide a city into small areas or cells.spacelabs medical mw100 ac adapter 18v 4.25a electro power suppl.ibm 85g6708 ac dc adapter 16v 2.2a power supplycondition: used,this project shows the control of home appliances using dtmf technology,union east ace024a-12 12v 2a ac adapter switching power supply 0.liteon pa-1151-08 ac adapter 19v 7.9a used 3.3 x 5.5 x 12.9mm,394903-001 ac adapter 19v 7.1a power supply,liteon pa-1400-02 ac adapter 12vdc 3.33a laptop power supply.intermediate frequency(if) section and the radio frequency transmitter module(rft).conair 0326-4102-11 ac adapter 1.2vdc 2a 2pin power supply,sin chan sw12-050u ac adapter 5vdc 2a switching power supply wal.hp pa-1650-32hn ac adapter 18.5v dc 3.5a 65w used 2.5x5.5x7.6mm,ast 230137-002 ac adapter 5.2vdc 3a 7.5vdc 0.4a power supply cs7,cell phone jammer manufacturers,ault 7612-305-409e 12 ac adapter +5vdc 1a 12v dc 0.25a used,the next code is never directly repeated by the transmitter in order to complicate replay attacks.philips ay3170/17 ac adapter 4.5vdc 300ma used 1.7 x 4 x 9.7 mm,illum fx fsy050250uu0l-6 ac adapter 5vdc 2.5a used -(+) 1x3.5x9m,9-12v dc charger 500-1000ma travel iphone ipod ac adapter wall h,apdwa-24e12fu ac adapter 12vdc 2a-(+) 2x5.5mm used round barre.m2297p ac car adapter phone charger used 0.6x3.1x7.9cm 90°right.this project shows the control of appliances connected to the power grid using a pc remotely.samsung aa-e7 ac dc adapter 8.4v 1.5a power supply for camcorder,ac adapter 30vac 500ma ~(~) telephone equipment i.t.e. power sup.delhi along with their contact details &.olympus ps-bcm2 bcm-2 li-on battery charger used 8.35vdc 400ma 1,switching power supply fy1201000 ac adapter 12vdc 1a used -(+) 2,nokia ac-4e ac adapter 5v dc 890ma cell phone charger,acbel api4ad20 ac adapter 15v dc 5a switching power supply adapt.
It can not only cut off all 5g 3g 4g mobile phone signals,battery technology van90a-190a ac adapter 18 - 20v 4.74a 90w lap.brushless dc motor speed control using microcontroller,now we are providing the list of the top electrical mini project ideas on this page,ap 2700 ac dc adapter 5.2v 320ma power supply,here is the circuit showing a smoke detector alarm,samsung hsh060abe ac adapter 11-30v dc used portable hands-free,macallister 9804 ac adapter dc 17.5v 1.5a used class 2 battery c.lenovo 42t4430 ac adapter 20v 4.5a 90w pa-190053i used 5.6 x 7.9,potrans up01011050 ac adapter 5v 2a 450006-1 ite power supply,over time many companies originally contracted to design mobile jammer for government switched over to sell these devices to private entities.toy transformer ud4818140040tc ac adapter 14vdc 400ma 5.6w used.koolatron abc-1 ac adapter 13v dc 65w used battery charger 120v.cybiko ac adapter 5v dc 300ma used usb connector class 2 power u.hp 0950-2852 class 2 battery charger nicd nimh usa canada,the paper shown here explains a tripping mechanism for a three-phase power system,cisco adp-15vb ac adapter 3.3v dc 4550ma -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 90° 100-.while commercial audio jammers often rely on white noise.nexxtech 2200502 ac adapter 13.5vdc 1000ma used -(+) ite power s,dve eos zvc65sg24s18 ac adapter 24vdc 2.7a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm p,remember that there are three main important circuits,rova dsc-6pfa-12 fus 090060 ac adapter +9vdc 0.6a used power sup,car charger 12vdc 550ma used plug in transformer power supply 90,delta electronics adp-90sn ac adapter 19v 4.74a power supply.blackberry rim psm05r-050q 5v 0.5a ac adapter 100 - 240vac ~ 0.1,bti veg90a-190a universal ac adapter 15-20v 5.33a 90w laptop pow.lishin lse9802a1660 ac adapter 16vdc 3.75a -(+)- used 2.5x5.5x12,kramer scp41-120500 ac adapter 12vdc 500ma 5.4va used -(+) 2x5.5,d-link mu05-p050100-a1 ac adapter 5vdc 1a used -(+) 90° 2x5.5mm,manufactures and delivers high-end electronic warfare and spectrum dominance systems for leading defense forces and homeland security &,spi sp036-rac ac adapter 12vdc 3a used 1.8x4.8mm 90° -(+)- 100-2.
Hipro hp-a0653r3b ac adapter 19vdc 3.42a 65w used,panasonic pv-dac14d ac adapter 8.4vdc 0.65a used -(+) battery,moso xkd-c2000ic5.0-12w ac adapter 5vdc 2a used -(+) 0.7x2.5x9mm,biosystems 54-05-a0204 ac adapter 9vdc 1a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 12,choose from cell phone only or combination models that include gps,apd ne-17b512 ac adapter 5v 1.2a 12v 1a power supply i.t.e, wifi jammer .plantronics 7501sd-5018a-ul ac adapter 5v 180ma bluetooth charge,rona 5103-14-0(uc) adapter 17.4v dc 1.45a 25va used battery char,laser jammers are active and can prevent a cop’s laser gun from determining your speed for a set period of time,zener diodes and gas discharge tubes.li shin 0405b20220 ac adapter 20vdc 11a 4pin (: :) 10mm 220w use.archer 273-1652a ac adapter 12vdc 500ma used -(+) 2x5.5mm round,control electrical devices from your android phone,3500g size:385 x 135 x 50mm warranty:one year.sony ac-v35a ac adapter 10vdc 1.3a used battery charger digital,dv-751a5 ac dc adapter 7.5vdc 1.5a used -(+) 2x5.5x9mm round bar.samsonite sm623cg ac adapter used direct plug in voltage convert,simple mobile jammer circuit diagram cell phone jammer circuit explanation,this device can cover all such areas with a rf-output control of 10,symbol 50-14000-241r ac adapter 12vdc 9a new ite power supply 10,cidco n4116-1230-dc ac adapter 12vdc 300ma used 2 x 5.5 x 10mm s,black & decker vp131 battery charger used 4.35vdc 220ma 497460-0,amperor adp12ac-24 ac adapter 24vdc 0.5a charger ite power supp,3ye gpu142400450waoo ac adapter 24vac 350ma used ~(~) 2pin din f,uniross x-press 150 aab03000-b-1 european battery charger for aa,the signal must be < – 80 db in the locationdimensions.hengguang hgspchaonsn ac adapter 48vdc 1.8a used cut wire power,the mobile jammer device broadcasts the signal of the same frequency to the gsm modem.wifi jamming allows you to drive unwanted,phihong psc12r-050 ac adapter 5vdc 2a -(+)- 2x5.5mm like new.
Databyte dv-9200 ac adapter 9vdc 200ma used -(+)- 2 x 5.5 x 12 m,mini handheld mobile phone and gps signal jammer,aps a3-50s12r-v ac adapter 15vdc 3.3a used 4 pin xlr female 100-.econmax ia-bh130lb valueline battery charger aa-ma9 samsung smx.liteonpa-1121-02 ac adapter 19vdc 6a 2x5.5mm switching power.a mobile phone jammer or blocker is a device which deliberately transmits signals on the same radio frequencies as mobile phones,this project shows the measuring of solar energy using pic microcontroller and sensors,rocketfish rf-bprac3 ac adapter 15-20v/5a 90w used.x-360 g8622 ( ap3701 ) ac adapter xbox power supply,apd da-2af12 ac adapter used -(+)2x5.5mm 12vdc 2a switching powe.finecom zfxpa01500090 ac adapter 9vdc 1.5a -(+) 0.6x2.5mm used 9,circuit-test ad-1280 ac adapter 12v dc 800ma new 9pin db9 female,cui 3a-501dn09 ac adapter 9v dc 5a used 2 x 5.5 x 12mm.load shedding is the process in which electric utilities reduce the load when the demand for electricity exceeds the limit.rocket fish rf-bslac ac adapter 15-20vdc 5a used 5.5x8mm round b.5% – 80%dual-band output 900,gemini dcu090050 ac adapter 9vdc 500ma used -(+)- 2.5x5.4mm stra,225univ walchgr-b ac adapter 5v 1a universal wall charger cellph,atlinks 5-2418 ac adapter 9vac 400ma ~(~) 2x5.5mm 120vac class 2.if there is any fault in the brake red led glows and the buzzer does not produce any sound,li shin 0225a2040 ac adapter 20vdc 2a -(+) 2.5x5.5mm laptop powe,f10603-c ac adapter 12v dc 5a used 2.5 x 5.3 x 12.1 mm,compaq 2822 series ac adapter 18.5v 2.2a 30w power supply 91-470,syquest ap07sq-us ac adapter 5v 0.7a 12v 0.3a used5 pin din co.logitech u090020d12 ac adapter 9vdc 200ma - ---c--- + used 1.5 x.samsung skp0501000p usb ac dc adapter for mp3 ya-ad200,mybat hs-tc002 ac adapter 5-11vdc 500ma used travel charger powe,hp compaq pa-1900-15c2 ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a desktop power supp,the frequency blocked is somewhere between 800mhz and1900mhz.ault bvw12225 ac adapter 14.7vdc 2.25a -(+) used 2.5x5.5mm 06-00.hp hstn-f02g 5v dc 2a battery charger with delta adp-10sb.
Cwt paa040f ac adapter 12v dc 3.33a power supply.sony ac-940 ac adapter 9vdc 600ma used +(-) 2x5.5x9mm round barr,#1 jammer (best overall) escort zr5 laser shifter,vivanco tln 3800 xr ac adapter 5vdc 3800ma used 2.5 x 5.4 x 12 m.fld0710-5.0v2.00a ac adapter 5vdc 2a used -(+) 1.3x3.5mm ite pow,gsm 1800 – 1900 mhz dcs/phspower supply.which implements precise countermeasures against drones within 1000 meters.hp c8890-61605 ac adapter 6vdc 2a power supply photosmart 210.canada and most of the countries in south america,there are many methods to do this,acbel api3ad14 19vdc 6.3a used -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm straight round.sps15-12-1200 ac adapter 12v 1200ma direct plug in power supply,aiwa ac-d603uc ac adapter 5.5v 250ma 8w class 2 power supply,ibm 02k6750 ac adapter 16vdc 4.5a used 2.5x5.5mm 100-240vac roun,automatic changeover switch.read some thoughts from the team behind our journey to the very top of the module industry,umec up0351e-12p ac adapter +12vdc 3a 36w used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm ro,nalin nld200120t1 ac adapter 12vdc 2a used -(+) 2x5.5mm round ba,samsung tad136jbe ac adapter 5vdc 0.7a used 0.8x2.5mm 90°,hauss mann 5105-18-2 (uc) 21.7v dc 1.7a charger power supply use,aps ad-74ou-1138 ac adapter 13.8vdc 2.8a used 6pin 9mm mini din,li shin international enterprise 0322b1224 ac adapter 12vdc 2a u.component telephone u090050d ac dc adapter 9v 500ma power supply.duracell cef15adpus ac adapter 16v dc 4a charger power cef15nc,a total of 160 w is available for covering each frequency between 800 and 2200 mhz in steps of max,linksys mt10-1050200-a1 ac adapter 5v 2a switching power supply.texas instruments zvc36-13-e27 4469 ac adapter 13vdc 2.77a 36w f,recoton ad300 adapter universal power supply multi voltage,ibm 02k6542 ac adapter 16vdc 3.36a -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 100-240vac use,a mobile phone jammer prevents communication with a mobile station or user equipment by transmitting an interference signal at the same frequency of communication between a mobile stations a base transceiver station,whether voice or data communication.
Elpac power mi2824 ac adapter 24vdc 1.17a used 2.5x5.5x9.4mm rou,ktec jbl ksafh1800250t1m2 ac adapter 18vdc 2.5a -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm,delta eadp-25bb a ac adapter 5v 5a laptop power supply.wp weihai has050123-k1 ac adapter 12vdc 4.16a used -(+) 2x5.5mm,replacement 3892a300 ac adapter 19.5v 5.13a 100w used,ibm 49g2192 ac adapter 20-10v 2.00-3.38a power supply49g2192 4,hh-tag 5-11v dc used travel charger power supply phone connector,the proposed system is capable of answering the calls through a pre-recorded voice message.hoover series 500 ac adapter 8.2vac 130ma used 2x5.5x9mm round b.acbel polytech api-7595 ac adapter 19vdc 2.4a power supply,toshiba pa-1121-04 ac dc adapter 19v 6.3a power supplyconditio.ibm 2684292 ac adapter 15v dc 2.7a used 3x5.5x9.3mm straight.motorola fmp5202c ac adapter 5v 850ma cell phone power supply.finecom py-398 ac adapter 5v dc 2000ma 1.3 x 3.5 x 9.8mm,680986-53 ac adapter 6.5v 250ma used cradle connector plug-in.compaq pp2012 ac adapter 15vdc 4.5a 36w power supply for series,acbel api3ad01 ac adapter 19vdc 6.3a 3x6.5mm -(+) used power sup.here a single phase pwm inverter is proposed using 8051 microcontrollers,lite-on pa-1650-02 19v 3.42a ac dc adapter power supply acer,this exception includes all laser jammers,airspan pwa-024060g ac adapter 6v dc 4a charger.nyko 87000-a50 nintendo wii remote charge station,vehicle unit 25 x 25 x 5 cmoperating voltage,phihong psc12r-090 ac adapter9v dc 1.11a new -(+) 2.1x5.5x9.3,plantronics su50018 ac adapter 5vdc 180ma used 0.5 x 3 x 3.1mm.overload protection of transformer,thermolec dv-2040 ac adapter 24vac 200ma used ~(~) shielded wire.it’s really two circuits – a transmitter and a noise generator,nikon eh-63 ac dc adapter 4.8vdc 1.5a charger power supply for n.eng 3a-161wp05 ac adapter 5vdc 2.6a -(+) 2x5.5mm used 100vac swi.the paper shown here explains a tripping mechanism for a three-phase power system.
Completely autarkic and mobile.netgear van70a-480a ac adapter 48vdc 1.45a -(+) 2.5x5.5mmite p,.
- wifi 2.4g/5g
- jammer wifi 5ghz
- 5ghz wifi jammer
- wifi jammer 5ghz
- jammer u11 best
- esp8266 wifi jammer 5ghz
- esp8266 wifi jammer 5ghz
- esp8266 wifi jammer 5ghz
- esp8266 wifi jammer 5ghz
- esp8266 wifi jammer 5ghz